Deck transformation

A deck transformation maps sheets to sheets

Let 𝑝 :˜𝑋 ↠𝑋 be a covering and 𝛾 :˜𝑋 →˜𝑋 be a Deck transformation. Let 𝑥0 ∈𝑋, 𝑈 ⊆𝑋 be an evenly covered open neighbourhood of 𝑥0, and ˜𝑈 ⊆˜𝑋 be a sheet over 𝑈. Then 𝛾(˜𝑈) is also a sheet over 𝑈. #m/thm/homotopy

Proof

Given a deck transformation 𝛾 :˜𝑋 →˜𝑋, the following diagram commutes.

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNCxbMCwwLCJcXHRpbGRlIFgiXSxbNCwwLCJcXHRpbGRlIFgiXSxbMiwyLCJYIl0sWzYsMF0sWzAsMiwicCIsMix7InN0eWxlIjp7ImhlYWQiOnsibmFtZSI6ImVwaSJ9fX1dLFsxLDIsInAiLDAseyJzdHlsZSI6eyJoZWFkIjp7Im5hbWUiOiJlcGkifX19XSxbMCwxLCJcXGdhbW1hIiwwLHsiY3VydmUiOi0xfV0sWzEsMCwiXFxnYW1tYV57LTF9IiwwLHsiY3VydmUiOi0xfV1d

Let 𝑈 be an evenly covered connected open set and ˜𝑈 be a sheet over 𝑈. Then 𝛾(˜𝑈) is connected and 𝑝𝛾(˜𝑈) =𝑈, so 𝛾(˜𝑈) ⊆˜𝑈′ for some sheet ˜𝑈′ over 𝑈. Let ˜𝑥 ∈˜𝑈′. Then 𝑝(˜𝑥) ∈𝑈 so there exists some ˜𝑥′ ∈𝛾(˜𝑈) ⊆˜𝑈′ such that 𝑝(˜𝑥′) =𝑝(˜𝑥). But 𝑝 is injective in ˜𝑈′ so ˜𝑥 =˜𝑥′ ∈˜𝑈′ Therefore ˜𝑈′ =˜𝑈.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr