Category theory MOC

Adjoint functor

An adjunction of functors is an adjunction in . #m/def/cat Let , be categories. A pair of functors form an adjunction, written

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsMixbMCwwLCJcXG1hdGhzZiBEIl0sWzIsMCwiXFxtYXRoc2YgQyJdLFswLDEsIkYiLDIseyJjdXJ2ZSI6MX1dLFsxLDAsIlUiLDIseyJjdXJ2ZSI6MX1dLFszLDIsIiIsMix7ImxldmVsIjoxLCJzdHlsZSI6eyJuYW1lIjoiYWRqdW5jdGlvbiJ9fV1d

or compactly , iff there is a natural isomorphism in of hom-sets1

When adjoints exist they are unique up to natural isomorphism, hence we call the left adjoint of , and the right adjoint of .

Proof of uniqueness

By duality, it suffices to prove right adjoints are unique up to natural isomorphism. Suppose . Then by adjunction

hence for any object we have

naturally and thus

naturally (see Yoneda embedding).

The name comes from an analogy to the Adjoint operator. In the archetypal examples, we think of as forgetful and as free — See Free-forgetful adjunction.

Unit and coünit

We can equivalently rephrase the condition for an adjunction in terms of a unit or coünit, so named since they form the corresponding data for a monad or comonad induced by the adjunction respectively.

To see that either of these are necessary and sufficient, note2

This gives us another perspective on adjunctions: They are a weakening of Equivalence of categories.

Properties


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2010. Category theory, §9

  2. 2020. From categories to homotopy theory, p. 40