First assume 𝑋 is Hausdorff.
Let (𝑎𝑛) →𝑎 in 𝑋,
and some 𝑏 ≠𝑎.
Then there exist open neighbourhood 𝐴 ∈T(𝑎) and 𝐵 ∈T(𝑏)
such that 𝐴 ∩𝐵 =∅.
Moreover there exists 𝑁, such that 𝑎𝑛 ∈𝐴 for all 𝑛 >𝑁.
Then 𝑎𝑛 ∉𝐵 for all such 𝑛
and hence (𝑎𝑛) ↛𝑏.
Thus limits are unique for any hausdorff space,
without invoking first-countability.
Now assume 𝑋 is first-countable with unique limit,
and let 𝑎,𝑏 ∈𝑋 such that 𝑎 ≠𝑏.
Let (𝐴𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ and (𝐵𝑛)𝑛∈ℕ be nested open neighbourhood bases of 𝑎 and 𝑏 respectively.
Assume 𝑋 is not hausdorff,
i.e. 𝐴𝑛 ∩𝐵𝑛 ≠∅ for all 𝑛 ∈ℕ.
Then we can construct a sequence (𝑥𝑛)∞𝑛=1 in 𝑋
such that 𝑥𝑛 ∈𝐴𝑛 ∩𝐵𝑛 for all 𝑛 ∈ℕ,
in which case (𝑥𝑛) →𝑎 and (𝑥𝑛) →𝑏
violating the uniqueness of limits.
Therefore 𝑋 must be hausdorff.