Unitary representation

Every finite complex representation of a compact group is equivalent to a unitary representation

Let 𝐺 be a compact group, 𝔛 :𝐺 β†’GL(𝑉) be a representation carried by a finite-dimensional complex inner product space 𝑉. Then 𝔛 is equivalent to a unitary representation. #m/thm/rep2 Alternatively, there always exists an inner product on 𝑉 for which 𝑉 is unitary.1

Proof

Let πœ‡ be the normalised Haar measure for 𝐺. We define

(𝑣|𝑀)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘€βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)

which is also an inner product on 𝑉 since

  1. conjugate symmetry
(𝑣|𝑀)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘€βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)=βˆ«πΊβ€•β€•β€•β€•β€•β€•β€•β€•βŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑀|𝔛(𝑔)π‘£βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)=――――(𝑀|𝑣)
  1. linear in second argument
(𝑣|𝛼𝑀+𝛽𝑒)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝛼𝔛(𝑔)𝑀+𝛽𝔛(𝑔)π‘’βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)=π›Όβˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘€βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)+π›½βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘’βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)=𝛼(𝑣|𝑀)+𝛽(𝑣|𝑒)
  1. positive definite
(𝑣|𝑣)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(𝑔)𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘£βŸ©βŸ___⏟___⏟>0π‘‘πœ‡(𝑔)>0

Let {𝑣𝑗} be an Orthonormal basis with respect to ⟨ β‹…| β‹…βŸ© and {𝑀𝑗} be an orthonormal basis with respect to ( β‹…| β‹…). Then there exists an invertible change of basis 𝑆 :𝑉 →𝑉 with 𝑆𝑀𝑗 =𝑣𝑗, which is also a Change of inner product with (𝑣|𝑀) =βŸ¨π‘†π‘£|π‘†π‘€βŸ©. We define

Λœπ”›(𝑔)=𝑆𝔛(𝑔)π‘†βˆ’1

which is equivalent to 𝔛, and unitary since

βŸ¨Λœπ”›(𝑔)𝑣|Λœπ”›(𝑔)π‘€βŸ©=βŸ¨π‘†π”›(𝑔)π‘†βˆ’1𝑣|𝑆𝔛(𝑔)π‘†βˆ’1π‘€βŸ©=(𝔛(𝑔)π‘†βˆ’1𝑣|𝔛(𝑔)π‘†βˆ’1𝑀)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(β„Žπ‘”)π‘†βˆ’1𝑣|𝔛(β„Žπ‘”)π‘†βˆ’1π‘€βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(β„Ž)=βˆ«πΊβŸ¨π”›(β„Ž)π‘†βˆ’1𝑣|𝔛(β„Ž)π‘†βˆ’1π‘€βŸ©π‘‘πœ‡(β„Ž)=(π‘†βˆ’1𝑣|π‘†βˆ’1𝑀)=βŸ¨π‘£|π‘€βŸ©

as required.2

Infinite, non–compact groups

A simple counterexample to this result for a nonfinite group may be achieved with 𝔛 :β„€ β†’GL(β„‚) :𝑛 β†¦π‘Žπ‘› where 𝑛 βˆˆβ„‚ βˆ–{0}. For π‘Ž β‰ 1 the representation is not unitary under the only inner product β„‚ supports βŸ¨π‘§|π‘€βŸ© =π‘§βˆ—π‘€.1


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 1996, Representations of finite and compact groups, pp. 21–22 ↩ ↩2

  2. 2021, Groups and representations, pp. 21–22 ↩