∗-representation of the complex group ring

Invariant subspaces of ∗-representations and unitary representations coïncide

Consider a mutually inducing pair of a Unitary representation Γ :𝐺 GL() and a ∗-representation Γ[𝐺] :[𝐺] GL(𝑉). Then every invariant subspace under Γ is an invariant subspace of Γ[𝐺] and vice-versa. #m/thm/rep Thus Γ is an irrep iff Γ[𝐺] is irreducible, i.e. has no non-trivial invariant subspace.

Proof

Let 𝑈 𝑉 be an invariant subspace of Γ. Then 𝑉 is also an invariant subspace of Γ[𝐺], because for any 𝑢 𝑈 and 𝑎 [𝐺]

Γ[𝐺](𝑎)𝑢=𝑔𝐺𝑎(𝑔)Γ(𝑔)𝑢𝑈𝑈

Likewise if 𝑈 𝑉 is an invariant subspace of Γ[𝐺] then it is also an invariant subspace of Γ, because for any 𝑢 𝑈 and 𝑔 𝐺

Γ(𝑔)𝑢=Γ[𝐺](𝛿𝑔)𝑢𝑈

as required.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr