Group ring

Isomorphism between the complex group ring and direct sum of matrix algebras on carriers of irreducible representations

Consider unitary irreps Γ𝛼 :𝐺 β†’GL(ℂ𝑑𝛼) for 𝛼 βˆˆΛ†πΊ. Then there exists a unitary isomorphism from the Group ring to the direct sum of matrix algebras

β„‚[𝐺]β†’β¨π›ΌβˆˆΛ†πΊM𝑑𝛼,𝑑𝛼⁑(β„‚)

defined by 𝑓 ↦̂𝑓 with1 #m/thm/rep

Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜=βˆ‘π‘”βˆˆπΊβ€•β€•β€•β€•Ξ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜(𝑔)𝑓(𝑔)=βŸ¨Ξ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜|π‘“βŸ©

and likewise

𝑓=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;π‘—π‘˜π‘‘π›ΌΜ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜Ξ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜

which is unitary from βŸ¨β‹…|β‹…βŸ© to the following inner product

βŸ¨Μ‚π‘“|Μ‚β„ŽβŸ©=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Όπ‘‘π›Όtr⁑[(ˆ𝑓𝛼)β€ Μ‚β„Žπ›Ό]=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑖,π‘—π‘‘π›Όβ€•β€•β€•Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘–π‘—Μ‚β„Žπ›Όπ‘–π‘—

and a homomorphism in the sense that

Μ‚(π‘“βˆ—β„Ž)𝛼𝑖𝑗=π‘‘π›Όβˆ‘π‘˜=1Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘–π‘˜Μ‚β„Žπ›Όπ‘˜π‘—
Proof

To verify the given inverse, note that by orthogonality of irreps, {βˆšπ‘‘π›ΌΞ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜} form an orthonormal basis with respect to the inner product ( β‹…| β‹…)

𝑓=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑗,π‘˜π‘‘π›ΌΜ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜Ξ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜=βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑗,π‘˜βˆšπ‘‘π›ΌΞ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜(βˆšπ‘‘π›ΌΞ“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜|𝑓)=𝑓̂𝑓𝛼𝑖𝑗=βŸ¨Ξ“π›Όπ‘–π‘—|π‘“βŸ©=(Γ𝛼𝑖𝑗|βˆ‘π›½;π‘˜,π‘™π‘‘π›ΌΜ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘˜π‘™Ξ“π›½π‘˜π‘™)=βˆ‘π›½;π‘˜,π‘™Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘˜π‘™(βˆšπ‘‘π›ΌΞ“π›Όπ‘–π‘—|βˆšπ‘‘π›ΌΞ“π›½π‘˜π‘™)=Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘—π‘˜

and hence it is a linear bijection. Since

βŸ¨π‘“|β„ŽβŸ©=⟨1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑖,𝑗𝑑𝛼̂𝑓𝛼𝑖𝑗Γ𝛼𝑖𝑗|1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›½;π‘˜π‘™π‘‘π›½Μ‚β„Žπ›½π‘˜π‘™Ξ“π›½π‘˜,π‘™βŸ©=1|𝐺|2βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑖,π‘—βˆ‘π›½;π‘˜,π‘™π‘‘π›Όπ‘‘π›½β€•β€•β€•Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘–π‘—Μ‚β„Žπ›½π‘˜π‘™βŸ¨Ξ“π›Όπ‘–π‘—|Ξ“π›½π‘˜π‘™βŸ©=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑖,π‘—βˆ‘π›½;π‘˜,π‘™π‘‘π›½β€•β€•β€•Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘–π‘—Μ‚β„Žπ›½π‘˜π‘™π›Ώπ›Όπ›½π›Ώπ‘–π‘˜π›Ώπ‘—π‘™=1|𝐺|βˆ‘π›Ό;𝑖,π‘—π‘‘π›Όβ€•β€•β€•Μ‚π‘“π›Όπ‘–π‘—Μ‚β„Žπ›Όπ‘–π‘—=βŸ¨Μ‚π‘“|Μ‚β„ŽβŸ©

it is unitary. From Convolution of matrix representations, it follows that

Μ‚(Ξ“π›Όπ‘–π‘—βˆ—Ξ“π›½π‘˜π‘™)π›Ύπ‘π‘ž=|𝐺|π‘‘π›Όπ›Ώπ›Όπ›½π›Ώπ‘—π‘˜Μ‚(Γ𝛼𝑖𝑙)π›Ύπ‘π‘ž=|𝐺|π‘‘π›Όπ›Ώπ›Όπ›½π›Ώπ‘—π‘˜βŸ¨Ξ“π›Ύπ‘π‘ž|Ξ“π›Όπ‘–π‘™βŸ©=|𝐺|2(𝑑𝛼)2π›Ώπ›Όπ›½π›Ώπ‘—π‘˜π›Ώπ›Ύπ›Όπ›Ώπ‘π‘–π›Ώπ‘™π‘ž=π‘‘π›Ύβˆ‘π‘š=1|𝐺|(𝑑𝛾)2π›Ώπ›Ύπ›Όπ›Ώπ‘π‘–π›Ώπ‘šπ‘—π›Ώπ›Ύπ›½π›Ώπ‘šπ‘˜π›Ώπ‘žπ‘™=π‘‘π›Ύβˆ‘π‘š=1βŸ¨Ξ“π›Ύπ‘π‘š|Ξ“π›Όπ‘–π‘—βŸ©βŸ¨Ξ“π›Ύπ‘šπ‘ž|Ξ“π›½π‘˜π‘™βŸ©=π‘‘π›Ύβˆ‘π‘š=1Μ‚(Γ𝛼𝑖𝑗)π›Ύπ‘π‘šΜ‚(Ξ“π›½π‘˜π‘™)π›Ύπ‘šπ‘ž

hence Μ‚β‹… preserves the algebra operations.

The isomorphism is denoted in such a way to evoke the Fourier transform due to similar properties. This may be viewed as a special case of the Wedderburn–Artin theorem.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 1996, Representations of finite and compact groups, Β§III.1, pp. 38–39 ↩