Sequence space

ℓ𝑝 space

For 𝑝 ∈[1,∞], the ℓ𝑝 space is a Banach space defined as the set of all sequences 𝑥∙ in ℂ with finite 𝑝-norm given by

‖𝑥∙‖𝑝=(∞∑𝑛=1|𝑥𝑛|𝑝)1/𝑝<∞

where in the case of 𝑝 =∞ we get the supremum

‖𝑥∙‖∞=sup{𝑥𝑛}∞𝑛=1

Thus ℓ𝑝 is equivalent to the Lebesgue space 𝐿𝑝(ℕ,𝜇) =L𝑝(ℕ,𝜇)1 where 𝜇 is the counting measure. More generally one defines ℓ𝑝(𝑆) =𝐿𝑝(𝑆,𝜇) with the counting measure for any set 𝑆.

Proof of Banach space

This all follows from the general case of a Lebesgue space, however we will explicitly show completeness for 𝑝 ∈[1,∞).

Let (𝑥(𝑛)∙)∞𝑛=1 be a Cauchy sequence in ℓ𝑝, i.e. for every 𝜖 >0 there exists some 𝑁 ∈ℕ such that for all 𝑛,𝑚 ≥𝑁 we have

∞∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑛)𝑖−𝑥(𝑚)𝑖|𝑝<𝜖𝑝

Now for any fixed 𝑗 ∈ℕ

|𝑥(𝑛)𝑗−𝑥(𝑚)𝑗|𝑝≤∞∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑛)𝑖−𝑥(𝑚)𝑖|𝑝<𝜖𝑝

so 𝑥(∙)𝑗 is a Cauchy sequence in ℝ convergent to some 𝑥𝑗. It remains to show that 𝑥∙ ∈ℓ𝑝 and (𝑥(𝑛)∙)∞𝑛=1 →𝑥∙. For any fixed 𝑘 ∈ℕ

𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖−𝑥(𝑛)𝑖|𝑝≤∞∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖−𝑥(𝑛)𝑖|<𝜖𝑝

whence

𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖−𝑥𝑖|𝑝<𝜖𝑝

and by the triangle inequality

(𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥𝑖|𝑝)1/𝑝≤(𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖−𝑥𝑖|𝑝)1/𝑝+(𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖|𝑝)1/𝑝<𝜖+(𝑘∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖|𝑝)1/𝑝

hence

‖𝑥∙‖𝑝≤𝜖+‖𝑥(𝑚)∙‖𝑝<∞

so 𝑥∙ ∈ℓ𝑝. Furthermore

‖𝑥(𝑚)∙−𝑥‖𝑝𝑝=∞∑𝑖=1|𝑥(𝑚)𝑖−𝑥𝑗|𝑝<𝜖𝑝

so indeed (𝑥(𝑛)∙)∞𝑛=1 →𝑥∙.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. There is no need to take a normed quotient here, ‖ ⋅‖𝑝 is already a full norm due to properties of the counting measure. ↩