Constructive ring theory MOC

Local ring

A ring 𝑅 is local1 iff it is nontrivial and it has the property that for all π‘Ž,𝑏 βˆˆπ‘… such that π‘Ž +𝑏 =1, either π‘Ž or 𝑏 is a unit. #m/def/ring/cons It follows that we have an apartness relation defined by

π‘Ž#𝑏=π‘Žβˆ’π‘Β is a unit.
Proof

Since 𝑅 is nontrivial, 0 is not a unit, giving irreflexivity.

Let π‘₯,𝑦,𝑧 :𝑅, and suppose π‘₯ βˆ’π‘§ is a unit. Then (π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦) +(𝑦 βˆ’π‘§) is a unit, let π‘Ž be its unique inverse. Then (π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦)π‘Ž +(𝑦 βˆ’π‘§)π‘Ž =1 so either (π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦)π‘Ž or (π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦)π‘Ž is a unit. If (π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦)π‘Ž is a unit, with inverse say 𝑏, then

(π‘₯βˆ’π‘¦)π‘Žπ‘=1=π‘Žπ‘(π‘₯βˆ’π‘¦)

so π‘₯ βˆ’π‘¦ is a unit. The other case gives that 𝑦 βˆ’π‘§ is a unit. This proves cotransitivity.

Finally, note that if π‘Ž βˆ’π‘ is a unit, then so too is 𝑏 βˆ’π‘Ž = βˆ’(π‘Ž βˆ’π‘), as the product of units. Thus symmetry also holds.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. One would be justified to use the term β€œapproximate division ring.” ↩