Natural Heisenerg algebras
Let
define Heisenberg algebras,
called the
for
Modules
Heisenberg modules
Let
setting
for
Triangular modules
Defining the linear form
Then then the triangular module and Heisenberg module
there exists a unique contravariant form
with the properties
for
Natural Heisenberg module
Let
We define the natural
with the
In the case
Conventionally we will take9
Virasoro representation
Letting
where
Then
is a graded representation of the Virasoro algebra
Proof
For
Hence for
The only remaining case is essentially that
it follows
where
We will compute
for
for
Now consider the case
where we have used an Iverson bracket and the fact that for
where
We have the following cases
for , since we may again commute and annihilate; for whence ;12 otherwise
Thus
as required.
In fact, the choice
for
and
See also
#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr
Footnotes
-
Note that the even subspace of
under is trivial, so the decomposition of matches the above. ↩ -
This is my own terminology, FLM do not give a name for these constructions. ↩
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, §1.7, pp. 24–25 ↩
-
This works because
. ↩ -
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, §1.8, pp. 29–30 ↩
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, §1.9 pp. 34–35 ↩
-
Since in either of these cases
carries a trivial representation of . In fact, FLM only define this way for and do not use a tensor product construction for . ↩ -
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, §1.9, p. 41 ↩
-
1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, §1.9 pp. 35–42. This seems to be the first theorem in the book. ↩
-
It should already be clear at this point that
exhibit a central extension of the Witt algebra, which must be equivalent to the Virasoro algebra. It turns out that the Virasoro algebra, and these operators, are engineered precisely so that gives the right coëfficient. ↩ -
In this calculation, keep the canonical realization of the Heisenberg commutation relations in mind. ↩