Heisenberg algebra

Natural Heisenerg algebras

Let π”₯ be a nondegenerate finite-dimensional quadratic space over 𝕂1 endowed with an abelian bracket, and 𝔀℀ =˜π”₯ and 𝔀℀+12 =˜π”₯[ βˆ’1] denote untwisted and twisted affine Lie algebras respectively, which are each triangular. Then the commutator ideals2

Λ†π”₯β„€=𝔀′℀=˜π”₯β€²=π–΅π–Ύπ–Όπ—π•‚π•‚π‘βŠ•β¨π‘›βˆˆβ„€βˆ–{0}π”₯βŠ—π‘‘π‘›Λ†π”₯β„€+12=𝔀′℀+12=˜π”₯[βˆ’1]β€²=π–΅π–Ύπ–Όπ—π•‚π•‚π‘βŠ•β¨π‘›βˆˆβ„€+12π”₯βŠ—π‘‘π‘›=Λ†π”₯[βˆ’1]

define Heisenberg algebras, called the β„€- and (β„€+12)-natural Heisenberg algebras3 induced by π”₯. #m/def/lie For 𝑍 =β„€ or 𝑍 =β„€ +12, we have the commutation relations

[𝑐,Λ†π”₯𝑍]=0[π‘₯βŠ—π‘‘π‘š,π‘¦βŠ—π‘‘π‘›]=⟨π‘₯,π‘¦βŸ©π‘šπ›Ώπ‘š+𝑛𝑐

for π‘₯,𝑦 ∈π”₯ and π‘š,𝑛 βˆˆπ‘ βˆ–{0}.4

Modules

Heisenberg modules

Let 𝑍 =β„€ or 𝑍 =β„€ +12 and π‘˜ βˆˆπ•‚. The Λ†π”₯𝑍-Heisenberg module is then isomorphic as a 𝕂-graded vector space

𝑀(π‘˜)β‰…π–¦π—‹π•‚π–΅π–Ύπ–Όπ—π•‚π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯𝑍)

setting π‘˜ =1 and denoting (β„Ž βŠ—π‘‘π‘›) βŠ™π‘£ =β„Ž(𝑛)𝑣 we have

π‘βŠ™π‘“=π‘˜π‘“β„Ž(βˆ’π‘›)βŠ™π‘“=β„Ž(βˆ’π‘›)π‘“β„Ž(𝑛)βŠ™π‘“=π‘˜π‘›πœ•π‘“πœ•β„Ž(βˆ’π‘›)

for β„Ž ∈π”₯ and 𝑛 βˆˆβ„•. In addition π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯𝑍) is a 𝕂-graded irreducible 𝔀𝑍 module where 𝑑 acts as a degree operator, and if 𝑍 =β„€, π”₯ =π”₯ βŠ—π‘‘0 act trivially.5

Triangular modules

Defining the linear form

πœ†:𝔀0𝑍→𝕂𝑐↦1𝑑↦0π”₯↦0(𝑍=β„€)

Then then the triangular module and Heisenberg module 𝑀(πœ†) =𝑀(1) as 𝔀𝑍-modules. Thus given the involutive antiautomorphism

πœ”:π‘β†¦π‘π‘‘β†¦π‘‘β„ŽβŠ—π‘‘π‘›β†¦β„ŽβŠ—π‘‘βˆ’π‘›(β„Žβˆˆπ”₯)

there exists a unique contravariant form

𝑏:π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯βˆ’π‘)Γ—π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯βˆ’π‘)→𝕂

with the properties

(π‘‘βŠ™π‘£,𝑀)=(𝑣,π‘‘βŠ™π‘€)((β„ŽβŠ—π‘‘π‘›)βŠ™π‘£,𝑀)=(𝑣,(β„ŽβŠ—π‘‘βˆ’π‘›)βŠ™π‘€)(1,1)=1

for β„Ž ∈π”₯, 𝑛 βˆˆπ‘, and 𝑣,𝑀 βˆˆπ‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯βˆ’π‘). The first conditions implies that 𝑏(𝑣,𝑀) =0 if 𝑣,𝑀 are homogenous of different degrees.6

Natural Heisenberg module 𝑀𝛼

Let 𝑍 =β„€ or 𝑍 =β„€ +12 and let π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯βˆ’π‘) denote the 𝔀𝑍- and Λ†π”₯𝑍-module 𝑀(1). Let 𝛼 ∈π”₯, πœ‡ βˆˆπ•‚, and 𝕂𝑣𝛼 be a 1-dimensional 𝔀𝑍-module defined by

β„ŽβŠ™π‘£π›Ό=βŸ¨β„Ž,π›ΌβŸ©π‘£π›Όβ„Žβˆˆπ”₯β„ŽβŠ™π‘£π›Ό=0β„ŽβˆˆΛ†π”€π‘π‘‘βŠ™π‘£π›Ό=πœ‡π‘£π›Ό

We define the natural 𝔀𝑍-module 𝑀𝛼 to be the tensor product of graded vector spaces7

𝑀=π‘†βˆ™(Λ†π”₯βˆ’π‘)βŠ—π•‚π•‚π‘£π›Ό

with the 𝔀𝑍-action given by the Tensor product of Lie algebra representations

β„ŽβŠ™(π‘“βŠ—π‘£π›Ό)=(β„ŽβŠ™π‘“)βŠ—π‘£π›Ό+π‘“βŠ—(β„ŽβŠ™π‘£π›Ό)

In the case 𝛼 =0 or 𝑍 =β„€ +128 this amounts to a shifted graded module by πœ‡. If 𝑍 =β„€

𝑀𝛼=Ind𝔀𝑍𝔀0π‘βŠ•π”€+𝑍⁑𝕂𝑣𝛼

Conventionally we will take9

πœ‡=⎧{ {⎨{ {βŽ©βˆ’12βŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©+124dim⁑π”₯𝑍=β„€βˆ’148dim⁑π”₯𝑍=β„€+12

Virasoro representation

Letting {β„Žπ‘–}dim⁑π”₯𝑖=1 be an orthonormal basis of π”₯, extending the ground field if necessary, we define the following (basis-independent) operators on 𝑀𝛼

𝐿(𝑛)=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)π‘›βˆˆβ„€πΏ(0)=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’|π‘˜|)β„Žπ‘–(|π‘˜|)+𝛽0dim⁑π”₯

where

𝛽0={0𝑍=β„€116𝑍=β„€+12

Then

πœ‘:𝔳→End𝕂⁑𝑀𝐿𝑛↦𝐿(𝑛)𝑐↦dim⁑π”₯

is a graded representation of the Virasoro algebra 𝔳.10

Proof

For β„Ž ∈π”₯, π‘š βˆˆβ„€, and π‘˜ βˆˆπ‘, it follows from the commutation relations on 𝑀 that

[𝐿(π‘š),β„Ž(π‘˜)]=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘[β„Ž(π‘˜),β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’β„“)β„Žπ‘–(β„“)]=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘[β„Ž(π‘˜),β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’β„“)]β„Žπ‘–(β„“)βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’β„“)[β„Ž(π‘˜),β„Žπ‘–(β„“)]=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘βŸ¨β„Ž,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©π‘˜π›Ώπ‘˜+π‘šβˆ’β„“β„Žπ‘–(β„“)βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’β„“)βŸ¨β„Ž,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©π‘˜π›Ώπ‘˜+β„“=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1π‘˜βŸ¨β„Ž,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜+π‘š)βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1π‘˜βŸ¨β„Ž,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜+π‘š)=βˆ’π‘˜β„Ž(π‘˜+π‘š)

Hence for π‘š,𝑛 βˆˆβ„€ with 𝑛 β‰ 0 and π‘š +𝑛 β‰ 0,

[𝐿(π‘š),𝐿(𝑛)]=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)]=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)]+12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)]β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘(π‘˜β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜+π‘š)+(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘š+π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜))=βˆ’12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘((π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜+π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)+(π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘š+π‘›βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜))=(π‘šβˆ’π‘›)𝐿(π‘š+𝑛)

The only remaining case is essentially that 𝑛 β‰ 0 and π‘š +𝑛 =0, since the 𝑛 =0 case may be reduced to either zero or another case by the alternating property. In this case, from the expression

𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€π‘šβ„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)+βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>π‘šβ„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š))

it follows

[𝐿(π‘š),𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)]=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€π‘š[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)]+βˆ‘π‘§βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>π‘š[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)])=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€π‘š([𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)]β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)+β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)])+βˆ‘π‘§βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>π‘š([𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)]β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)+β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)[𝐿(π‘š),β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)]))=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€π‘š((π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)+π‘˜β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜))+βˆ‘π‘§βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>π‘š(π‘˜β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)+(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)))=12dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€π‘š(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)+βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜β‰€0(π‘š+π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)+βˆ‘π‘§βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>0(π‘š+π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)+βˆ‘π‘§βˆˆπ‘:π‘˜>π‘š(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜))=2π‘šπΏ(0)+π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š

where π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š is some constant which we get from the 𝛽0 term and reversing the order of some β„Žπ‘–( βˆ’π‘˜)β„Ž(π‘˜) where necessary.11

We will compute π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š using the application of of [𝐿(π‘š),𝐿( βˆ’π‘š)] to a vacuum vector of 𝑀, e.g. 𝑣𝛼. We note the following facts: From above there is a unique contravariant form such that (𝑣𝛼,𝑣𝛼) =1 and

(β„Ž(𝑛)𝑣,𝑀)=(𝑣,β„Ž(βˆ’π‘›)𝑀)(𝑑𝑣,𝑀)=(𝑣,𝑑𝑀)

for β„Ž ∈π”₯, 𝑛 βˆˆπ‘, and 𝑣,𝑀 βˆˆπ‘€. It follows by the definition of 𝐿(𝑛) that

(𝐿(𝑛)𝑣,𝑀)=(𝑣,𝐿(βˆ’π‘›)𝑀)

for 𝑛 βˆˆβ„€ and 𝑣,𝑀 βˆˆπ‘€. We also have

dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1β„Žπ‘–(0)2𝑣𝛼=βŸ¨π›Ό,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©βŸ¨π›Ό,β„Žπ‘–βŸ©π‘£π›Ό=βŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©π‘£π›Ό

Now consider the case π‘š >0. Then

π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š=(𝑣𝛼,π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘šπ‘£π›Ό)=(𝑣𝛼,([𝐿(π‘š),𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)]βˆ’2π‘šπΏ(0))𝑣𝛼)=(𝑣𝛼,(𝐿(π‘š)𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)βˆ’2π‘šπΏ(0))𝑣𝛼)=(𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)𝑣𝛼,𝐿(βˆ’π‘š)𝑣𝛼)βˆ’2π‘š(𝑣𝛼,𝐿(0)𝑣𝛼)=14dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘—=1(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€π‘˜β‰€π‘šβ„Žπ‘–(π‘˜βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’π‘˜)𝑣𝛼,βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€β„“β‰€π‘šβ„Žπ‘—(β„“βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘—(βˆ’β„“)𝑣𝛼)=βˆ’β‘π‘š(𝑣𝛼,dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1β„Žπ‘–(0)2𝑣𝛼)[0βˆˆπ‘]βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯=14dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1(𝑣𝛼,(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€π‘˜β‰€π‘šβ„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜))(βˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€β„“β‰€π‘šβ„Žπ‘–(β„“βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’β„“))𝑣𝛼)=βˆ’β‘π‘šβŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©[0βˆˆπ‘]βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯

where we have used an Iverson bracket and the fact that for 𝑖 ≠𝑗 we can commute the positively graded operators to annihilate 𝑣𝛼. Now consider each of the terms

πœ‚π‘š,𝑖,π‘˜,β„“=(𝑣𝛼,β„Žπ‘–(π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)β„Žπ‘–(β„“βˆ’π‘š)β„Žπ‘–(βˆ’β„“)𝑣𝛼)

where 0 β‰€π‘˜,β„“ β‰€π‘š, so that

π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š=14dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€π‘˜β‰€π‘šβˆ‘β„“βˆˆπ‘:0β‰€β„“β‰€π‘šπœ‚π‘š,𝑖,π‘˜,β„“βˆ’π‘šβŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©[0βˆˆπ‘]βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯

We have the following cases

  • πœ‚π‘š,𝑖,π‘˜,β„“ =0 for β„“ βˆ‰{π‘˜,π‘š βˆ’π‘˜}, since we may again commute and annihilate;
  • πœ‚π‘š,𝑖,π‘˜,β„“ =π‘š(𝑣𝛼,β„Žπ‘–(0)2𝑣𝛼) for π‘˜ ∈{0,π‘š} whence β„“ ∈{0,π‘š};12
  • πœ‚π‘š,𝑖,π‘˜,β„“ =1 otherwise

Thus

π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š=14dim⁑π”₯βˆ‘π‘–=1βŽ›βŽœ βŽœβŽβˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆ{0,π‘š}βˆ©π‘βˆ‘β„“βˆˆ{0,π‘š}βˆ©π‘π‘š(𝑣𝛼,β„Žπ‘–(0)2𝑣𝛼)+βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:0<π‘˜<π‘šβˆ‘β„“βˆˆ{π‘˜,π‘šβˆ’π‘˜}1⎞⎟ ⎟⎠=βˆ’β‘π‘šβŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©[0βˆˆπ‘]βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯=π‘šβŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©[0βˆˆπ‘]+14(dim⁑π”₯)∣{(π‘˜,β„“)βˆˆπ‘2:0<π‘˜<π‘š,β„“βˆˆ{π‘˜,π‘šβˆ’π‘˜}}∣=βˆ’β‘π‘šβŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©[0βˆˆπ‘]βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯=14(dim⁑π”₯)∣{(π‘˜,β„“)βˆˆπ‘2:0<π‘˜<π‘š,β„“βˆˆ{π‘˜,π‘šβˆ’π‘˜}}βˆ£βˆ’2π‘šπ›½0dim⁑π”₯=12(dim⁑π”₯)(βˆ‘π‘˜βˆˆπ‘:0<π‘˜<π‘šπ‘˜(π‘šβˆ’π‘˜)βˆ’4π‘šπ›½0)=dim⁑π”₯12(π‘š3βˆ’π‘š)

as required.

In fact, the choice πœ‘(𝑐) =dim⁑π”₯ and 𝔭 =π•‚π‘‘βˆ’1 +𝕂𝑑0 +𝕂𝑑1 being trivial uniquely determine the central term in the commutation relations for the Virasoro algebra. Letting 𝐿′𝑛 =𝐿𝑛 βˆ’124𝛿𝑛𝑐, the above choice of πœ‡ gives

𝐿′0βŠ™π‘£=βˆ’π‘‘βŠ™π‘£

for 𝑣 βˆˆπ‘€π›Ό. The 𝐿(0)-eigenvalue of a homogenous element 𝑣 βˆˆπ‘€π›Ό is termed the weight and denoted wt⁑𝑣 so that

deg⁑𝑣=βˆ’wt⁑𝑣+124dim⁑π”₯

and

wt⁑𝑣𝛼={112βŸ¨π›Ό,π›ΌβŸ©π‘=β„€116dim⁑π”₯𝑍=β„€+12

See also


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. char⁑𝕂 =0 ↩

  2. Note that the even subspace of π”₯ under πœ— = βˆ’1 is trivial, so the decomposition of ˆ𝔀[πœ—] matches the above. ↩

  3. This is my own terminology, FLM do not give a name for these constructions. ↩

  4. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.7, pp. 24–25 ↩

  5. This works because ˜π”₯ =(˜π”₯ β‹Šπ•‚π‘‘) Γ—π”₯. ↩

  6. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.8, pp. 29–30 ↩

  7. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9 pp. 34–35 ↩

  8. Since in either of these cases 𝕂𝑣𝛼 carries a trivial representation of 𝔀𝑍. In fact, FLM only define 𝑀 this way for 𝑍 =β„€ and do not use a tensor product construction for 𝑍 =β„€ +12. ↩

  9. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9, p. 41 ↩

  10. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§1.9 pp. 35–42. This seems to be the first theorem in the book. ↩

  11. It should already be clear at this point that 𝐿(𝑛) exhibit a central extension of the Witt algebra, which must be equivalent to the Virasoro algebra. It turns out that the Virasoro algebra, and these operators, are engineered precisely so that π›Ύπ‘š,βˆ’π‘š gives the right coΓ«fficient. ↩

  12. In this calculation, keep the canonical realization of the Heisenberg commutation relations in mind. ↩