Local Lagrangian

Path Lagrangian

Let 𝑀 be a 𝐢𝛼-manifold and P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏) be the space of 𝐢𝛼-paths 𝛾 from π‘π‘Ž to 𝑝𝑏, i.e.

𝛾:[π‘Ž,𝑏]→𝑀:π‘Žβ†¦π‘π‘Ž:𝑏↦𝑝𝑏.

A first order local Lagrangian on P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏) has the form

𝐿[𝛾]=𝐿(𝑑,𝛾(𝑑),˙𝛾(𝑑))d𝑑

where we abuse notation to invoke a 𝐢𝛼-function

𝐿:ℝ×𝑇𝑀→ℝ

so that the action functional β„’ :P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏) →ℝ has the form

β„’[𝛾]=βˆ«π‘π‘ŽπΏ(𝑑,𝛾(𝑑),˙𝛾(𝑑))d𝑑.

Euler-Lagrange equations

Let π‘₯ :π‘ˆ β†’β„π‘š be local coΓΆrdinates for 𝑀. A path 𝛾 ∈P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏) is stationary1 iff #m/thm/variations

0=πœ•πΏπœ•π›Ύπœ‡βˆ’ddπ‘‘πœ•πΏπœ•Λ™π›Ύπœ‡

where we denote π›Ύπœ‡ =π‘₯πœ‡ βˆ˜π›Ύ.

Proof

Let 𝛼 :( βˆ’πœ–0,πœ–0) β†’P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏) be a variation of 𝛾. Then

β„’[𝛼(πœ–)]=βˆ«π‘π‘ŽπΏ(𝑑,𝛼(πœ–;𝑑),˙𝛼(πœ–;𝑑))d𝑑

whence

𝛿ℒ[𝛾;𝛼]=ddπœ–βˆ£πœ–=0βˆ«π‘π‘ŽπΏ(𝑑,𝛼(πœ–;𝑑),˙𝛼(πœ–;𝑑))d𝑑=βˆ«π‘π‘Žddπœ–βˆ£πœ–=0𝐿(𝑑,𝛼(πœ–;𝑑),˙𝛼(πœ–;𝑑))d𝑑=βˆ«π‘π‘Ž(πœ•πΏπœ•π›Ύπœ‡πœ•π›Όπœ‡πœ•πœ–(0;𝑑)+πœ•πΏπœ•Λ™π›Ύπœ‡πœ•Λ™π›Όπœ‡πœ•πœ–(0;𝑑))d𝑑=βˆ«π‘π‘Ž(πœ•πΏπœ•π›Ύπœ‡πœ•π›Όπœ‡πœ•πœ–(0;𝑑)+πœ•πΏπœ•Λ™π›Ύπœ‡πœ•2π›Όπœ‡πœ•π‘‘Β πœ•πœ–(0;𝑑))d𝑑.

Applying Integration by parts on the latter term, and noting the boundary term vanishes since we are in P(π‘Ž,𝑏,π‘π‘Ž,𝑝𝑏), we get

𝛿ℒ[𝛾;𝛼]=βˆ«π‘π‘Ž(πœ•πΏπœ•π›Ύπœ‡βˆ’ddπ‘‘πœ•πΏπœ•Λ™π›Ύπœ‡)πœ•π›Όπœ‡πœ•πœ–(0;𝑑)dπ‘₯=0

so by the Fundamental lemma of variational calculus

0=πœ•πΏπœ•π›Ύπœ‡βˆ’ddπ‘‘πœ•πΏπœ•Λ™π›Ύπœ‡

as claimed.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. i.e. the first variation 𝛿ℒ[𝛾] vanishes. ↩