Assume ๐พ is perfect.
^P2 already covers the case charโก๐พ =0,
so assume ๐พ is a field of prime characteristic ๐ with a Frobenius automorphism ๐ :๐พ โ๐พ
By ^P1, an inseparable irreducible polynomial ๐(๐ฅ) โ๐พ[๐ฅ] must be of the form
๐(๐ฅ)=๐โ๐=0๐๐(๐ฅ๐)๐for some {๐๐}๐๐=0 โ๐พ.
But
๐โ1(๐(๐ฅ))=๐โ๐=0๐โ1(๐๐)๐ฅ๐:=๐(๐ฅ)whence ๐(๐ฅ)๐ =๐(๐ฅ), contradicting irreducibility,
so every irreducible polynomial must in fact be separable.
For the converse, assume ๐พ is imperfect, so ๐พ is a prime field of characteristic ๐ and the Frobenius endomorphism is not surjective.
It suffices to construct an inseparable irreducible polynomial.
By non-surjectivity there exists an ๐ผ โ๐พ such that ๐(๐ฅ) :=๐ฅ๐ โ๐ผ โ๐พ[๐ฅ] has no roots in ๐พ and therefore no linear factors.
In โโ๐พ, on the other hand, ๐(๐ฅ) does have a root ๐ฝ, and in fact, applying the Frobenius endomorphism, we see
๐(๐ฅ)=(๐ฅโ๐ฝ)๐which is separable.
It follows that an irreducible factor of ๐(๐ฅ) is separable, as required.