QM in 1D position-space

QM of a particle in a 1D Dirac delta potential

A particle in a Dirac delta potential 𝑉(π‘₯) = βˆ’π›Όπ›Ώ(π‘₯)1 has exactly one bound state

πœ“(π‘₯)=βˆšπ‘šπ›Όβ„π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2𝐸=βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό22ℏ2

and scattering states2

πœ“(π‘₯)={π΄π‘’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯+π΅π‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯π‘₯≀0πΉπ‘’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯+πΊπ‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯π‘₯β‰₯0

where 𝐹 βˆ’πΊ =𝐴(1 +2𝑖𝛽) βˆ’π΅(1 βˆ’2𝑖𝛽) and 𝛽 =π‘šπ›Όβ„2π‘˜

Proof

We begin with bound states (i.e. 𝐸 <0). Letting πœ… =βˆšβˆ’2π‘šπΈ/ℏ the SchrΓΆdinger equation for π‘₯ β‰ 0 reads

𝑑2πœ“π‘‘π‘₯2=πœ…2πœ“

which has the general solution πœ“(π‘₯) =Λœπ΄π‘’πœ…π‘₯ +Λœπ΅π‘’βˆ’πœ…π‘₯. Applying the boundary conditions πœ“( ±∞) =0 and continuity of πœ“ we conclude πœ“(π‘₯) =π΅π‘’βˆ’πœ…|π‘₯|. Integrating the complete SchrΓΆdinger equation over ( βˆ’πœ–,πœ–) gives

πΈβˆ«πœ–βˆ’πœ–πœ“(π‘₯)𝑑π‘₯=βˆ’β„22π‘šβˆ«πœ–βˆ’πœ–π‘‘2πœ“π‘‘π‘₯2𝑑π‘₯βˆ’π›Όβˆ«πœ–βˆ’πœ–π›Ώ(π‘₯)πœ“(π‘₯)𝑑π‘₯=βˆ’β„22π‘š[𝑑2πœ“π‘‘π‘₯2]π‘₯=πœ–π‘₯=βˆ’πœ–βˆ’π›Όπœ“(0)

and taking the limit πœ– β†’0 gives

βˆ’2π‘šπ›Όβ„2𝐡=π‘‘πœ“π‘‘π‘₯(0+)βˆ’π‘‘πœ“π‘‘π‘₯(0βˆ’)=2πœ…π΅

hence πœ… = βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό/ℏ2 and

𝐸=βˆ’β„2πœ…22π‘š=βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό22ℏ2

Normalization yields

1=|𝐡|2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘’βˆ’2πœ…|π‘₯|𝑑π‘₯=2|𝐡|2∫∞0π‘’βˆ’2πœ…π‘₯𝑑π‘₯=|𝐡|2πœ…

hence 𝐡 =βˆšπœ… =βˆšπ‘šπ›Ό/ℏ.

For scattering states (𝐸 β‰₯0), let π‘˜ =√2π‘šπΈ/ℏ. The SchrΓΆdinger equation for π‘₯ β‰ 0 thence becomes

𝑑2πœ“π‘‘π‘₯2=βˆ’π‘˜2πœ“

it follows

πœ“(π‘₯)={Λœπ΄π‘’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯+Λœπ΅π‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯π‘₯≀0ΛœπΉπ‘’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯+ΛœπΊπ‘’βˆ’π‘–π‘˜π‘₯π‘₯β‰₯0

where continuity requires 𝐴 +𝐡 =𝐹 +𝐺. The derivatives are

π‘‘πœ“π‘‘π‘₯(0βˆ’)=π‘–π‘˜βˆ’π΄βˆ’π΅)π‘‘πœ“π‘‘π‘₯(0βˆ’)=π‘–π‘˜(πΉβˆ’πΊ)

hence

βˆ’2π‘šπ›Όβ„2(π΄βˆ’π΅)=π‘–π‘˜(πΉβˆ’πΊβˆ’π΄+𝐡)

which may be reΓ€rranged to

πΉβˆ’πΊ=𝐴(1+2𝑖𝛽)βˆ’π΅(1βˆ’2𝑖𝛽)

where 𝛽 =π‘šπ›Ό/ℏ2π‘˜

Properties

  1. The reflection and transmission coΓ«fficients (regardless of which side the particle enters) for scattering states are
𝑅=11+(2ℏ2𝐸/π‘šπ›Ό2)𝑇=11+(2π‘šπ›Ό2/2ℏ2𝐸)

which do not depend on the sign of 𝛼. 2. The bound state has the following expectation values - βŸ¨Λ†π‘₯⟩ =0 - βŸ¨Λ†π‘βŸ© =0 - βŸ¨Λ†π‘₯2⟩ =ℏ22π‘š2𝛼2 - βŸ¨Λ†π‘2⟩ =(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2

Proof of 1–2

Since the velocities of the particle are equal on either side of the potential, it is sufficient to compare the coëfficients of the unnormalized scattering state. Since the setup is symmetric, without loss of generality let the particle scatter from the left, so 𝐺 =0. Thus 𝐴 corresponds to the incident wave amplitude, 𝐡 to the reflected wave, and 𝐹 to the transmitted wave.

𝐡=𝑖𝛽1βˆ’π‘–π›½π΄πΉ=11βˆ’π‘–π›½π΄

thus

𝑅=|𝐡|2|𝐴|2=𝛽21+𝛽2=11+(2ℏ2𝐸/π‘šπ›Ό2)𝑇=|𝐹|2|𝐴|2=11+𝛽2=11+(2π‘šπ›Ό2/2ℏ2𝐸)

as claimed by ^P1. Note that these are unchanged for negative 𝛼.

First we compute the necessary derivatives

𝑑𝑑π‘₯πœ“(π‘₯)=βˆšπ‘šπ›Όβ„{π‘šπ›Όβ„2π‘’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2π‘₯≀0βˆ’π‘šπ›Όβ„2π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2π‘₯β‰₯0=(π‘šπ›Όβ„2)3/2(Θ(βˆ’π‘₯)π‘’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2βˆ’Ξ˜(π‘₯)π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2)𝑑2𝑑π‘₯2πœ“(π‘₯)=(π‘šπ›Όβ„2)3/2(βˆ’π›Ώ(π‘₯)(π‘’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ+π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ)+π‘šπ›Όβ„2Θ(βˆ’π‘₯)(π‘’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2+Θ(π‘₯)π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2))=(π‘šπ›Όβ„2)3/2(βˆ’2𝛿(π‘₯)+π‘šπ›Όβ„2π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2)

where Θ is the Heaviside function. Thus

βŸ¨πœ“|Λ†π‘₯|πœ“βŸ©=π‘šπ›Όβ„2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘₯π‘’βˆ’2π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2⏟__⏟__⏟odd𝑑π‘₯=0βŸ¨πœ“|Λ†π‘₯2|πœ“βŸ©=π‘šπ›Όβ„2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘₯2π‘’βˆ’2π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2⏟__⏟__⏟even𝑑π‘₯=2π‘šπ›Όβ„2∫∞0π‘₯2π‘’βˆ’2π‘šπ›Όπ‘₯/ℏ2𝑑π‘₯=2π‘šπ›Όβ„2(2!)(ℏ22π‘šπ›Ό)3=ℏ42π‘š2𝛼2βŸ¨πœ“|ˆ𝑝|πœ“βŸ©=βˆ’π‘–β„βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπœ“(π‘₯)𝑑𝑑π‘₯πœ“(π‘₯)𝑑π‘₯=βˆ’π‘–β„π‘šπ›Όβ„2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆž(Θ(βˆ’π‘₯)βˆ’Ξ˜(π‘₯))πœ“(π‘₯)2⏟____⏟____⏟odd𝑑π‘₯=0βŸ¨πœ“|ˆ𝑝2|πœ“βŸ©=βˆ’β„2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπœ“(π‘₯)𝑑2𝑑π‘₯2πœ“(π‘₯)𝑑π‘₯=βˆ’(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2(βˆ’2𝛿(π‘₯)+π‘šπ›Όβ„2π‘’βˆ’π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2)𝑑π‘₯=(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2[2βˆ’π‘šπ›Όβ„22βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘’βˆ’2π‘šπ›Ό|π‘₯|/ℏ2𝑑π‘₯]=(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2[2βˆ’π‘šπ›Όβ„2ℏ22π‘šπ›Ό]=(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2[2βˆ’π‘šπ›Όβ„2ℏ2π‘šπ›Ό]=(π‘šπ›Όβ„)2

proving ^P2.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2018. Introduction to quantum mechanics, Β§2.5.2, pp. 63ff. ↩

  2. yet to be dirac normalized ↩