QM in 1D position-space

QM of a particle in a harmonic oscillator

A particle in the harmonic oscillator potential

𝑉(π‘₯)=12π‘šπœ”2π‘₯2=12πœ”β„πœ‰2

where πœ‰ =βˆšπ‘šπœ”/ℏπ‘₯ is a dimensionless variable has ground state

πœ“0(π‘₯)=(π‘šπœ”πœ‹β„)1/4π‘’βˆ’π‘šπœ”π‘₯2/2ℏ=(π‘šπœ”πœ‹β„)1/4π‘’βˆ’πœ‰2/2

with all stationary states and their energies given by

πœ“π‘›=1βˆšπ‘›!(Λ†π‘Ž+)π‘›πœ“0𝐸𝑛=(𝑛+12)β„πœ”

where 𝑛 βˆˆβ„•0 and

Λ†π‘ŽΒ±=π‘šπœ”Λ†π‘₯βˆ“π‘–Λ†π‘βˆš2π‘šπœ”β„=1√2(Λ†πœ‰βˆ“π‘‘π‘‘πœ‰)

are the so-called ladder operators (see properties below).

Proof of solutions

The time independent SchrΓΆdinger equation is

12π‘š(ˆ𝑝2+(π‘šπœ”Λ†π‘₯)2)πœ“=πΈπœ“

which is only normalizable for 𝐸 >0 (see). Motivated by finding a β€œdifference of perfect squares” like representation for ˆ𝐻,1 we define the ladder operators given above with the properties listed below. thus the time-independent SchrΓΆdinger equation becomes

β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Β±12)πœ“=πΈπœ“

Crucially, Λ†π‘ŽΒ± have the property that given a solution Λ†π»πœ“ =πΈπœ“ to the TISE, then Λ†π‘ŽΒ±πœ“ also solve the SchrΓΆdinger equation:

ˆ𝐻(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±πœ“)=β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Β±12)(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±πœ“)=β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Β±12Λ†π‘ŽΒ±)πœ“=β„πœ”Λ†π‘ŽΒ±(Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Β±12)πœ“=Λ†π‘ŽΒ±β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Β±1Β±12)πœ“=Λ†π‘ŽΒ±(Λ†π»Β±β„πœ”)πœ“=Λ†π‘ŽΒ±(πΈΒ±β„πœ”)πœ“=(πΈΒ±β„πœ”)Λ†π‘ŽΒ±πœ“

which also follows from the defining property of Ladder operators. Since successively applying Λ†π‘Žβˆ’ lowers energy, and normalizable solutions have nonnegative energy, the sequence must terminate with Λ†π‘Žβˆ’πœ“0 =0. Finding this β€œbottom rung” amounts to solving the differential equation

π‘‘πœ“0𝑑π‘₯=βˆ’π‘šπœ”β„π‘₯πœ“0

is a First-order linear differential equation with normalized solution

πœ“0(π‘₯)=(π‘šπœ”πœ‹β„)1/4π‘’βˆ’π‘šπœ”π‘₯2/2ℏ

All normalizable solutions must be given by the ladder operators, since otherwise an alternate bottom rung could be found.

Orthonormality

It follows from ^LP8 and ^LP9 that

|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=1βˆšπ‘›!(Λ†π‘Ž+)𝑛|πœ“0⟩

hence the states given above are normalized. Orthogonality is manifest in

π‘›βŸ¨πœ“π‘š|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βŸ¨πœ“π‘š|Λ†π‘Ž+Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βŸ¨πœ“π‘š|(Λ†π‘Ž+Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)†|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=π‘šβŸ¨πœ“π‘š|πœ“π‘›βŸ©

and hence (π‘š βˆ’π‘›)βŸ¨πœ“π‘š|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =0, implying βŸ¨πœ“π‘š|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =0 for π‘š ≠𝑛.

An alternate representation in terms of Hermite polynomials2 is3

πœ“π‘›(π‘₯)=(π‘šπœ”πœ‹β„)1/41√2𝑛𝑛!𝐻𝑛(πœ‰)π‘’βˆ’πœ‰2/2

Properties

  1. The harmonic oscillator potential is a good approximation for many potentials with a minimum at 0, since 𝑉(π‘₯) =𝑉(0) +𝑉′(0)π‘₯ +12𝑉″(0)π‘₯2 +β‹―.
  2. The following general equations for expectation values hold for a stationary state |πœ“π‘›βŸ©
    • βŸ¨Λ†π‘₯⟩ =0
    • βŸ¨Λ†π‘βŸ© =0
    • βŸ¨Λ†π‘₯2⟩ =(πœŽΛ†π‘₯)2 =𝐸𝑛/π‘šπœ”2 =(𝑛+12)β„π‘šπœ”
    • βŸ¨Λ†π‘2⟩ =(πœŽΛ†π‘)2 =π‘šπΈπ‘› =(𝑛+12)π‘šβ„πœ”
    • βŸ¨π‘‰βŸ© =12π‘šπœ”2βŸ¨Λ†π‘₯2⟩ =𝐸𝑛2 =(𝑛+12)β„πœ”2
    • βŸ¨π‘‡βŸ© =βŸ¨π‘2⟩2π‘š =𝐸𝑛2 =(𝑛+12)β„πœ”2
Proof of 2

Clearly βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘₯|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =βˆ«βˆžβˆ’βˆžπ‘₯|πœ“π‘›(π‘₯)|2 𝑑π‘₯ =0 by Integration properties, proving ^Ex. Invoking various Properties of the ladder operators

βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|ˆ𝑝|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=π‘–βˆšβ„π‘šπœ”2βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž+βˆ’Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=π‘–βˆšβ„π‘šπœ”2(βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ©)=π‘–βˆšβ„π‘šπœ”2(βˆšπ‘›+1βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|πœ“π‘›+1βŸ©βˆ’βˆšπ‘›+1βŸ¨πœ“π‘›+1|πœ“π‘›βŸ©)=0βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘₯2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=ℏ2π‘šπœ”βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž++Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=ℏ2π‘šπœ”βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|((Λ†π‘Ž+)2+(Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2+{Λ†π‘Ž+,Λ†π‘Žβˆ’})|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=ℏ2π‘šπœ”(βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž+)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©+βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©+2β„πœ”βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|ˆ𝐻|πœ“π‘›βŸ©)=πΈπ‘›π‘šπœ”2=(𝑛+12)β„π‘šπœ”βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|ˆ𝑝2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βˆ’β„π‘šπœ”2βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž+βˆ’Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βˆ’β„π‘šπœ”2βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|((Λ†π‘Ž+)2+(Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2βˆ’{Λ†π‘Ž+,Λ†π‘Žβˆ’})|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βˆ’β„π‘šπœ”2(βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž+)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©+βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)2|πœ“π‘›βŸ©βˆ’2β„πœ”βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|ˆ𝐻|πœ“π‘›βŸ©)=π‘šπΈπ‘›=(𝑛+12)π‘šβ„πœ”

proving ^Ep, ^Ex2, and ^Ep2, whence ^EV and ^ET immediately follow.

Properties of the ladder operators

  1. Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ± =Λ†π»β„πœ” Β±12
  2. [Λ†π‘Žβˆ’,Λ†π‘Ž+] =1
  3. ˆ𝐻 =β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Β±12)
  4. [ˆ𝐻,Λ†π‘ŽΒ±] = Β±β„πœ”Λ†π‘ŽΒ±
  5. (Λ†π‘ŽΒ±)† =Λ†π‘Žβˆ“
  6. Λ†π‘₯ =βˆšβ„2π‘šπœ”(Λ†π‘Ž+ +Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)
  7. ˆ𝑝 =π‘–βˆšβ„π‘šπœ”2(Λ†π‘Ž+ βˆ’Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)
  8. Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =βˆšπ‘›+1|πœ“π‘›+1⟩
  9. Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =βˆšπ‘›|πœ“π‘›βˆ’1⟩ for 𝑛 >0
  10. {Λ†π‘ŽΒ±,Λ†π‘Žβˆ“} =2Λ†π»β„πœ”
Proof of 1–5, 8–10

Properties 1–3 and 10 follow from

Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ±=12β„π‘šπœ”(ˆ𝑝2+(π‘šπœ”Λ†π‘₯)2)βˆ“π‘–2ℏ[Λ†π‘₯,ˆ𝑝]=Λ†π»β„πœ”Β±12

For ^LP4 note

[ˆ𝐻,Λ†π‘ŽΒ±]=[β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Β±12),Λ†π‘ŽΒ±]=β„πœ”[Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“,Λ†π‘ŽΒ±]Β±β„πœ”[12,Λ†π‘ŽΒ±]=β„πœ”(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ±βˆ’Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘ŽΒ±Λ†π‘Žβˆ“)=β„πœ”Λ†π‘ŽΒ±[Λ†π‘Žβˆ“,Λ†π‘ŽΒ±]=Β±β„πœ”Λ†π‘ŽΒ±

which shows that these are indeed ladder operators, and thus ^LP5 follows from ^P1.4

From ^LP5 we have

βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘ŽΒ±)β€ Λ†π‘ŽΒ±|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘Žβˆ“Λ†π‘ŽΒ±|πœ“π‘›βŸ©

but from the SchrΓΆdinger equation, ^LP3, and the ^energies formula, it follows that

Λ†π‘Ž+Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=𝑛|πœ“π‘›βŸ©,Λ†π‘Žβˆ’Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=(𝑛+1)|πœ“π‘›βŸ©

hence

βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Ž+)β€ Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘Žβˆ’Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=(𝑛+1)βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|πœ“π‘›βŸ©βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|(Λ†π‘Žβˆ’)β€ Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|Λ†π‘Ž+Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ©=π‘›βŸ¨πœ“π‘›|πœ“π‘›βŸ©

thus if |πœ“π‘›βŸ© and |πœ“π‘›Β±1⟩ are normalized, Λ†π‘Ž+|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =βˆšπ‘›+1|πœ“π‘›+1⟩ and Λ†π‘Žβˆ’|πœ“π‘›βŸ© =βˆšπ‘›|πœ“π‘›βˆ’1⟩, proving ^LP8 and ^LP9


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2018. Introduction to quantum mechanics, Β§2.3.1, pp. 40ff ↩

  2. Normalized so that the highest power of πœ‰ has coΓ«fficient 2𝑛. ↩

  3. 2018. Introduction to quantum mechanics, Β§2.3.2, p. 52 ↩

  4. This follows from completeness since the behaviour of Λ†π‘Žβˆ’ matches that predicted by ^P1 for (Λ†π‘Ž+)† all eigenfunctions, and therefore is the same operator. ↩