Yoneda lemma
Let
where
where naturality in

commutes; and naturality in 
commutes.1
Proof
For
Conversely, given an
whose naturality condition is given by the diagram
Now for
so
Now we calculate
but by naturality of
wherefore
Conversely, for
Therefore
defines a bijection for any
For naturality in
so the required diagram commutes.
For naturality in
as required.
Corollaries
-
The “theorem”: The Yoneda embedding is an embedding.
#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr
Footnotes
-
2010. Category theory, §8.3, pp. 189–192 ↩