Group extension

Central group extension

A group extension of ๐ด by ๐ต

1โ†’๐ตexpโ†ช๐บ๐œ‹โ† ๐ดโ†’1

is called central iff ๐ต โ†ช๐บ is contained within the centre ๐‘(๐บ), #m/def/group whence ๐ต is abelian. In what follows we write ๐ต additively and ๐บ and ๐ด multiplicatively, and write e๐‘ =e(๐‘) for any ๐‘ โˆˆ๐ต,

Second cohomology

Identifying ๐ต with the corresponding โ„ค-module equipped with the trivial representation of ๐บ (thus a โ„ค[๐บ]-module) may consider the Group cohomology, where the 2-cochains ๐ถ2(๐บ,๐ต) are maps1

๐œ€0:๐ดร—๐ดโ†’๐ต

and the 2-cocycles ๐‘2(๐บ,๐ต) are 2-cochains such that

๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž๐‘,๐‘)=๐œ€0(๐‘,๐‘)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘๐‘)โˆ€๐‘Ž,๐‘,๐‘โˆˆ๐บ

and the 2-coboundaries ๐ต2(๐บ,๐ต) are 2-cochains such that

๐œ€0(๐‘Ž๐‘)=๐œ‚(๐‘Ž๐‘)โˆ’๐œ‚(๐‘Ž)โˆ’๐œ‚(๐‘)โˆ€๐‘Ž,๐‘โˆˆ๐บ

for some 1-cochain ๐œ‚ :๐ด โ†’๐ต. Thus, in particular, โ„ค-bilinear maps ๐ด ร—๐ด โ†’๐ต are 2-cocycles. The second cohomology group is then

๐ป2(๐ด,๐ต)=๐‘2(๐ด,๐ต)/๐ต2(๐ด,๐ต)

Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions

Given any ๐–ฒ๐–พ๐—-section ๐‘ (โˆ’) :๐ด โ†’๐บ of ๐œ‹ we have ๐บ ={๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘ :๐‘Ž โˆˆ๐ด;๐‘ โˆˆ๐ต}; and ๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘ =๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘) defines a 2-cycle. Conversely let ๐œ€0 :๐ด ร—๐ด โ†’๐ต be a 2-cocycle. Then the set ๐ต ร—๐ด is a group under the following multiplication

(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โ‹…(๐‘ž,๐‘)=(๐‘+๐‘ž+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘),๐‘Ž๐‘)

with identity ( โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),1), and we have the above central extension where

๐œ‹:(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โ†ฆ๐‘Žexp:๐‘โ†ฆ(๐‘โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),1)

and for the associated section ๐‘ (โˆ’) :๐‘Ž โ†ฆ(0,๐‘Ž) we have ๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘ =๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘). Note ๐‘ 1 =1 iff ๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,1) =๐œ€0(1,๐‘Ž) =0 for all ๐‘Ž โˆˆ๐ด.

Proof

That ๐บ ={๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘ :๐‘Ž โˆˆ๐ด;๐‘ โˆˆ๐ต} follows from the the fact cosets of ๐ต partition ๐บ. Next we claim

e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)=๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘

defines a 2-cocycle. Note that ๐œ‹(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘) =1, hence the formula is well-defined. Letting ln denote the inverse of exp, we have

=๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘๐‘)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž๐‘,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ€0(๐‘,๐‘)=lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘)โˆ’lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘๐‘)+lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘)โˆ’lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘๐‘ ๐‘๐‘ ๐‘)=lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘)+lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘)โˆ’lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘๐‘ ๐‘๐‘ ๐‘)=lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘)+lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘)=lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘)+lnโก(๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘)=0

as required, where we have used centrality of ๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘.

Now given a 2-cocycle ๐œ€0 โˆˆ๐‘2(๐ด,๐ต) we define the following multiplication on the set ๐ต ร—๐ด

(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โ‹…(๐‘,๐‘)=(๐‘+๐‘ž+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘),๐‘Ž๐‘)

which clearly constitutes a monoid since

(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โ‹…(โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),1)=(๐‘โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,1),๐‘Ž)=(๐‘+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,1โ‹…1)โˆ’๐œ€0(๐‘Žโ‹…1,1),๐‘Ž)=(๐‘,๐‘Ž)

and likewise on the right. The inverse is easily seen to be given by

(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โˆ’1=(โˆ’๐‘โˆ’๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘Žโˆ’1)โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),๐‘Žโˆ’1)

Thus the given multiplication makes the set ๐ต ร—๐ด a group which we denote ๐บ. Clearly we have the central extension

1โ†’๐ตexpโ†ช๐บ๐œ‹โ† ๐ดโ†’1

where exp and ๐œ‹ are given above. Letting ๐‘ ๐‘Ž =(0,๐‘Ž), we find Noting that

๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,1)=๐œ€0(1,1)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,1โ‹…1)โˆ’๐œ€0(๐‘Žโ‹…1,1)=๐œ€0(1,1)

now

(0,๐‘Ž๐‘)e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)=(0,๐‘Ž๐‘)(๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),1)=(๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1)+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž๐‘,1))=(๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘),1)=(0,๐‘Ž)(0,๐‘)

as claimed.

This correspondence has the property

Central extensions are equivalent iff their 2-cocycles for some sections are cohomologous. Thus there is a bijection between ๐ป2(๐ด,๐ต) and equivalence classes of extensions.

Proof

Consider the central extension

1โ†’๐ตexpโ†ช๐บ๐œ‹โ† ๐ดโ†’1

and let ๐‘ (โˆ’),๐‘ก(โˆ’) :๐ด โ†ช๐บ be ๐–ฒ๐–พ๐—-sections of ๐œ‹, and consider the corresponding 2-cycles ๐œ€0,๐œ‚0 โˆˆ๐‘2(๐ด,๐ต) defined by

๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘=๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘=๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘e๐œ‚0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)

Then, taking into account the fact ๐œ‹(๐‘ฅ) =1 implies ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ๐‘(๐บ),

e๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ‚0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)=๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘๐‘กโˆ’1๐‘๐‘กโˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘=๐‘ ๐‘๐‘กโˆ’1๐‘๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘กโˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘

so

๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)โˆ’๐œ‚0(๐‘Ž,๐‘)=lnโก(๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž๐‘)โˆ’lnโก(๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘Ž)โˆ’lnโก(๐‘ก๐‘๐‘ โˆ’1๐‘)โˆˆ๐ต2(๐ด,๐ต)

thus different sections of ๐œ‹ give cohomologous 2-cocycles. It immediately follows that equivalent central extensions will give cohomologous 2-cocycles.

For the converse, it is sufficient to show that given a central extension with a section ๐‘ (โˆ’) such that ๐‘ 1 =1 and a corresponding 2-cycle ๐œ€0 :๐ด ร—๐ด โ†’๐ต, the induced extension on ๐บโ€ฒ =๐–ฒ๐–พ๐—๐ต ร—๐ด is equivalent. We show that the following commutes

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNixbMCwxLCIxIl0sWzIsMSwiQiJdLFs0LDAsIkciXSxbNCwyLCJHJyJdLFs2LDEsIkEiXSxbOCwxLCIxIl0sWzAsMV0sWzEsMiwiXFxleHAiXSxbMiw0LCJcXHBpIl0sWzQsNV0sWzEsMywiXFxleHAnIl0sWzMsNCwiXFxwaSciXSxbMiwzLCJcXHZhcnBoaSIsMSx7InN0eWxlIjp7ImJvZHkiOnsibmFtZSI6ImRhc2hlZCJ9fX1dXQ==

where

๐œ‹โ€ฒ:(๐‘,๐‘Ž)โ†ฆ๐‘Žexpโ€ฒ:๐‘โ†ฆ(๐‘โˆ’๐œ€0(1,1),1)=(๐‘,1)๐œ‘:๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘โ†ฆ(๐‘,๐‘Ž)

and ๐œ‘ :๐บ โ†’๐บโ€ฒ is an isomorphism. Note that for every ๐‘” โˆˆ๐บ, ๐‘” =๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘ for unique ๐‘Ž โˆˆ๐ด and ๐‘ โˆˆ๐ต, so ๐œ‘ is a well-defined bijection. Further, for any ๐‘Ž,๐‘ โˆˆ๐ด and ๐‘,๐‘ž โˆˆ๐ต

๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘๐‘ ๐‘e๐‘ž)=๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘e๐‘+๐‘ž)=๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘e๐‘+๐‘ž+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘))=(๐‘+๐‘ž+๐œ€0(๐‘Ž,๐‘),๐‘Ž๐‘)=(๐‘,๐‘Ž)(๐‘ž,๐‘)=๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘)๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘e๐‘ž)

so ๐œ‘ is a group isomorphism, and

๐œ‘(expโก๐‘)=๐œ‘(๐‘ 1e๐‘)=(๐‘,1)=expโ€ฒโก๐‘๐œ‹โ€ฒ๐œ‘(๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘)=๐œ‹โ€ฒ(๐‘,๐‘Ž)=๐‘Ž=๐œ‹(๐‘ ๐‘Že๐‘)

so the diagram commutes, as required.

Special cases


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, ยง5.1, p. 103 โ†ฉ