Group extension

Central group extension

A group extension of 𝐴 by 𝐡

1→𝐡expβ†ͺπΊπœ‹β† π΄β†’1

is called central iff 𝐡 β†ͺ𝐺 is contained within the centre 𝑍(𝐺), #m/def/group whence 𝐡 is abelian. In what follows we write 𝐡 additively and 𝐺 and 𝐴 multiplicatively, and write e𝑏 =e(𝑏) for any 𝑏 ∈𝐡,

Second cohomology

Central extensions of 𝐴 by 𝐡 are classified by second group cohomology of 𝐴 with coëfficients in 𝐡.

Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions

Given any 𝖲𝖾𝗍-section 𝑠(βˆ’) :𝐴 →𝐺 of πœ‹ we have 𝐺 ={π‘ π‘Že𝑏 :π‘Ž ∈𝐴;𝑏 ∈𝐡}; and π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘ =π‘ π‘Žπ‘eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏) defines a 2-cycle. Conversely let πœ€0 :𝐴 ×𝐴 →𝐡 be a 2-cocycle. Then the set 𝐡 ×𝐴 is a group under the following multiplication

(𝑝,π‘Ž)β‹…(π‘ž,𝑏)=(𝑝+π‘ž+πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏),π‘Žπ‘)

with identity ( βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),1), and we have the above central extension where

πœ‹:(𝑝,π‘Ž)β†¦π‘Žexp:𝑝↦(π‘βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),1)

and for the associated section 𝑠(βˆ’) :π‘Ž ↦(0,π‘Ž) we have π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘ =π‘ π‘Žπ‘eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏). Note 𝑠1 =1 iff πœ€0(π‘Ž,1) =πœ€0(1,π‘Ž) =0 for all π‘Ž ∈𝐴.

Proof

That 𝐺 ={π‘ π‘Že𝑏 :π‘Ž ∈𝐴;𝑏 ∈𝐡} follows from the the fact cosets of 𝐡 partition 𝐺. Next we claim

eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)=π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘

defines a 2-cocycle. Note that πœ‹(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘) =1, hence the formula is well-defined. Letting ln denote the inverse of exp, we have

=πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)βˆ’πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏𝑐)+πœ€0(π‘Žπ‘,𝑐)βˆ’πœ€0(𝑏,𝑐)=ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘)βˆ’ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘π‘)+ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘)βˆ’ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1𝑏𝑐𝑠𝑏𝑠𝑐)=ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘)+ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘π‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘)βˆ’ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1𝑏𝑐𝑠𝑏𝑠𝑐)=ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘)+ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘)=ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘)+ln⁑(π‘ βˆ’1π‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘ π‘Žπ‘)=0

as required, where we have used centrality of π‘ βˆ’1π‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘ π‘Žπ‘.

Now given a 2-cocycle πœ€0 βˆˆπ‘2(𝐴,𝐡) we define the following multiplication on the set 𝐡 ×𝐴

(𝑝,π‘Ž)β‹…(𝑝,𝑏)=(𝑝+π‘ž+πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏),π‘Žπ‘)

which clearly constitutes a monoid since

(𝑝,π‘Ž)β‹…(βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),1)=(π‘βˆ’πœ€0(1,1)+πœ€0(π‘Ž,1),π‘Ž)=(𝑝+πœ€0(π‘Ž,1β‹…1)βˆ’πœ€0(π‘Žβ‹…1,1),π‘Ž)=(𝑝,π‘Ž)

and likewise on the right. The inverse is easily seen to be given by

(𝑝,π‘Ž)βˆ’1=(βˆ’π‘βˆ’πœ€0(π‘Ž,π‘Žβˆ’1)βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),π‘Žβˆ’1)

Thus the given multiplication makes the set 𝐡 ×𝐴 a group which we denote 𝐺. Clearly we have the central extension

1→𝐡expβ†ͺπΊπœ‹β† π΄β†’1

where exp and πœ‹ are given above. Letting π‘ π‘Ž =(0,π‘Ž), we find Noting that

πœ€0(π‘Ž,1)=πœ€0(1,1)+πœ€0(π‘Ž,1β‹…1)βˆ’πœ€0(π‘Žβ‹…1,1)=πœ€0(1,1)

now

(0,π‘Žπ‘)eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)=(0,π‘Žπ‘)(πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),1)=(πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)βˆ’πœ€0(1,1)+πœ€0(π‘Žπ‘,1))=(πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏),1)=(0,π‘Ž)(0,𝑏)

as claimed.

This correspondence has the property

Central extensions are equivalent iff their 2-cocycles for some sections are cohomologous. Thus there is a bijection between 𝐻2(𝐴,𝐡) and equivalence classes of extensions.1

Proof

Consider the central extension

1→𝐡expβ†ͺπΊπœ‹β† π΄β†’1

and let 𝑠(βˆ’),𝑑(βˆ’) :𝐴 β†ͺ𝐺 be 𝖲𝖾𝗍-sections of πœ‹, and consider the corresponding 2-cycles πœ€0,πœ‚0 βˆˆπ‘2(𝐴,𝐡) defined by

π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘=π‘ π‘Žπ‘eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘=π‘‘π‘Žπ‘eπœ‚0(π‘Ž,𝑏)

Then, taking into account the fact πœ‹(π‘₯) =1 implies π‘₯ βˆˆπ‘(𝐺),

eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)βˆ’πœ‚0(π‘Ž,𝑏)=π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘π‘‘βˆ’1π‘π‘‘βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘=π‘ π‘π‘‘βˆ’1π‘π‘ π‘Žπ‘‘βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘

so

πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)βˆ’πœ‚0(π‘Ž,𝑏)=ln⁑(π‘‘π‘Žπ‘π‘ βˆ’1π‘Žπ‘)βˆ’ln⁑(π‘‘π‘Žπ‘ βˆ’1π‘Ž)βˆ’ln⁑(π‘‘π‘π‘ βˆ’1𝑏)∈𝐡2(𝐴,𝐡)

thus different sections of πœ‹ give cohomologous 2-cocycles. It immediately follows that equivalent central extensions will give cohomologous 2-cocycles.

For the converse, it is sufficient to show that given a central extension with a section 𝑠(βˆ’) such that 𝑠1 =1 and a corresponding 2-cycle πœ€0 :𝐴 ×𝐴 →𝐡, the induced extension on 𝐺′ =𝖲𝖾𝗍𝐡 ×𝐴 is equivalent. We show that the following commutes

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNixbMCwxLCIxIl0sWzIsMSwiQiJdLFs0LDAsIkciXSxbNCwyLCJHJyJdLFs2LDEsIkEiXSxbOCwxLCIxIl0sWzAsMV0sWzEsMiwiXFxleHAiXSxbMiw0LCJcXHBpIl0sWzQsNV0sWzEsMywiXFxleHAnIl0sWzMsNCwiXFxwaSciXSxbMiwzLCJcXHZhcnBoaSIsMSx7InN0eWxlIjp7ImJvZHkiOnsibmFtZSI6ImRhc2hlZCJ9fX1dXQ==

where

πœ‹β€²:(𝑝,π‘Ž)β†¦π‘Žexpβ€²:𝑝↦(π‘βˆ’πœ€0(1,1),1)=(𝑝,1)πœ‘:π‘ π‘Že𝑝↦(𝑝,π‘Ž)

and πœ‘ :𝐺 →𝐺′ is an isomorphism. Note that for every 𝑔 ∈𝐺, 𝑔 =π‘ π‘Že𝑝 for unique π‘Ž ∈𝐴 and 𝑝 ∈𝐡, so πœ‘ is a well-defined bijection. Further, for any π‘Ž,𝑏 ∈𝐴 and 𝑝,π‘ž ∈𝐡

πœ‘(π‘ π‘Že𝑝𝑠𝑏eπ‘ž)=πœ‘(π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘e𝑝+π‘ž)=πœ‘(π‘ π‘Žπ‘e𝑝+π‘ž+πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏))=(𝑝+π‘ž+πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏),π‘Žπ‘)=(𝑝,π‘Ž)(π‘ž,𝑏)=πœ‘(π‘ π‘Že𝑝)πœ‘(𝑠𝑏eπ‘ž)

so πœ‘ is a group isomorphism, and

πœ‘(exp⁑𝑝)=πœ‘(𝑠1e𝑝)=(𝑝,1)=expβ€²β‘π‘πœ‹β€²πœ‘(π‘ π‘Že𝑝)=πœ‹β€²(𝑝,π‘Ž)=π‘Ž=πœ‹(π‘ π‘Že𝑝)

so the diagram commutes, as required.

Special cases


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, Β§5.1, p. 103 ↩