Central extension of an abelian group

Cyclic central extension of a free abelian group

Let 𝐴 =℀𝑆 be a free abelian group of finite rank 𝑛. Then there is a bijection between the set of alternating β„€-bilinear maps

𝑐0:𝐴×𝐴→℀+𝑝

and equivalence classes of central extensions

1β†’β„€+𝑝expβ†ͺΛ†π΄πœ‹β† π΄β†’1

given by taking 𝑐0 as the associated commutator map, and using the Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions.1 #m/thm/group

Proof

That equivalent central extensions determine the same commutator map follows from ^P3 and Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions.

Now let

𝑐0:𝐴×𝐴→℀+𝑝

be an alternating β„€-bilinear map and let 𝑆 ={π‘Žπ‘–}𝑛𝑖=1. Let

πœ€0:𝐴×𝐴→℀+𝑝(𝛼𝑖,𝛼𝑗)↦{𝑐0(𝛼𝑖,𝛼𝑗)𝑖>𝑗0𝑖≀𝑗

Then πœ€0 is β„€-bilinear and thus a 2-cocycle, amd πœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏) βˆ’πœ€0(𝑏,π‘Ž) =𝑐0(π‘Ž,𝑏). By the Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions, there is a central extension of the form above with 2-cocycle πœ€0 and thus commutator map 𝑐0.

Finally let

1β†’β„€+𝑝β†ͺπ΅πœ‹β€²β† π΄β†’1

be a central extension with the same commutator map 𝑐0. Define a 𝖲𝖾𝗍-section 𝑠(βˆ’) of πœ‹β€² so that

𝑠(βˆ’):π‘›βˆ‘π‘˜=1π‘šπ‘˜π‘Žπ‘˜=π‘›βˆπ‘˜=1π‘ π‘šπ‘˜π‘Žπ‘˜

Then

π‘ π‘Žπ‘ π‘=π‘ π‘Ž+𝑏eπœ€0(π‘Ž,𝑏)

for any π‘Ž,𝑏 ∈𝐴, so by the Correspondence between 2-cocycles and central extensions these extensions are equivalent.

Automorphisms

Letting πœ‹π‘₯ =――π‘₯ and

Aut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e)={πœ‘βˆˆAut⁑ˆ𝐴:πœ‘exp=exp}Aut⁑(𝐴;𝑐0)={πœ“βˆˆAut⁑𝐴:𝑐0(πœ“,πœ“)=𝑐0}

we have the group extension2

1→𝖠𝖻(𝐴,β„€+𝑝)βˆ—β†ͺAut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e)πœ‹β† Aut⁑(𝐴;𝑐0)β†’1

where for πœ† βˆˆπ– π–»(𝐴,β„€+𝑝) β‰…(β„€+𝑝)𝑛, #m/thm/group

πœ†βˆ—:ˆ𝐴→ˆ𝐴π‘₯↦π‘₯eπœ†Β―π‘₯
Proof

Note πœ†βˆ— is a group homomorphism for any πœ† βˆˆπ– π–»(𝐴,β„€+𝑝) since

πœ†βˆ—(π‘₯𝑦)=π‘₯eπœ†β€•β€•π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•π‘¦=π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•π‘₯+πœ†β€•β€•π‘¦=π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•β€•π‘₯𝑦=(πœ†βˆ—π‘₯)(πœ†βˆ—π‘¦)

and that βˆ— is itself a group homomorphism since for πœ†,πœ‡ βˆˆπ– π–»(𝐴,β„€+𝑝)

(πœ†+πœ‡)βˆ—π‘₯=π‘₯eπœ†β€•β€•π‘₯+πœ‡β€•β€•π‘₯=πœ†βˆ—(π‘₯eπœ‡β€•β€•π‘₯)=πœ†βˆ—πœ‡βˆ—π‘₯

Furthermore, the induced automorphism β€•β€•β€•πœ†βˆ— =id𝐴 for any πœ† βˆˆπ– π–»(𝐴,β„€+𝑝).

Now let πœ‘ ∈Aut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e) be an automorphism such that β€•β€•πœ‘ =id𝐴. It follows that πœ‘π‘₯ =π‘₯e𝑓(π‘₯) for some function 𝑓 :ˆ𝐴 β†’β„€+𝑝. Noting that

π‘₯e𝑓(π‘₯)=πœ‘π‘₯=πœ‘(π‘₯e𝑠)=π‘₯e𝑓(π‘₯e𝑠)

it follows that 𝑓(π‘₯) =πœ†β€•β€•π‘₯ for some function πœ† :𝐴 β†’β„€+𝑝, and since

π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•β€•π‘₯𝑦=πœ‘(π‘₯𝑦)=(πœ‘π‘₯)(πœ‘π‘¦)=π‘₯eπœ†β€•β€•π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•π‘¦=π‘₯𝑦eπœ†β€•β€•π‘₯+πœ†β€•β€•π‘¦

it follows πœ† βˆˆπ– π–»(𝐴,β„€+𝑝).

Now consider a general πœ‘ ∈Aut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e). Then

𝑐0(Β―πœ‘Β―π‘₯,Β―πœ‘Β―π‘¦)=ln⁑[πœ‘π‘₯,πœ‘π‘¦]=lnβ‘πœ‘[π‘₯,𝑦]=ln⁑[π‘₯,𝑦]=𝑐0(――π‘₯,――𝑦)

for all π‘₯,𝑦 βˆˆΛ†π΄, so β€•β€•πœ‘ ∈Aut⁑(𝐴;𝑐0). Conversely, given πœ“ ∈Aut⁑(𝐴;𝑐0) we consider the central extension

1β†’β„€+𝑝β†ͺΛ†π΄πœ“πœ‹β† π΄β†’1

which has the commutator map 𝑐0, and thus from the above correspondence, this extension is equivalent to the original one, giving an automorphism in Aut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e).

Furthermore, any automorphism πœ— ∈Aut⁑(ˆ𝐴;e) such that β€•β€•πœ— = βˆ’1 is itself an involution.

Special cases


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, ΒΆ5.2.3, pp. 106–107 ↩

  2. 1988. Vertex operator algebras and the Monster, ΒΆ5.4.1, p. 112 ↩