Ideal of the complex group ring

Equivalence of irreps on left ideals criterion

Let πΏπœ‡π›Ό and πΏπœˆπ›½ be minimal left ideals transforming under the Regular group representation in irreps Ξ“πœ‡ and Ξ“πœˆ respectively, and π‘’πœ‡π›Ό and π‘’πœˆπ›½ be the generating primitive idempotents. Then Ξ“πœ‡ β‰…Ξ“πœˆ iff π‘’πœ‡π›Ό βˆ—π‘ž βˆ—π‘’πœˆπ›½ β‰ 0 for some π‘ž βˆˆβ„‚[𝐺]. #m/thm/rep

Proof

If πœ‡ =𝜈 then there exists an intertwiner 𝑆 :πΏπœ‡π›Ό β†’πΏπœ‡π›½ with π‘†Ξ“πœ‡π›Ό =Ξ“πœˆπ›½π‘† and thus by lineΓ€rity

𝑆P(π‘’πœ‡π›Ό)Ξ›(π‘Ÿ)𝑝=P(π‘’πœˆπ›Ό)Ξ›(π‘Ÿ)π‘†π‘π‘†π‘Ÿβˆ—π‘βˆ—π‘’πœ‡π›Ό=π‘Ÿβˆ—π‘†π‘βˆ—π‘’πœ‡π›Ό

for all 𝑝,π‘Ÿ βˆˆβ„‚[𝐺]. Then π‘ž =π‘†π‘’πœ‡π›Ό βˆˆπΏπœˆπ›½ has the required property, since

π‘’πœ‡π›Όβˆ—π‘†π‘’πœ‡π›Όβˆ—π‘’πœˆπ›½=π‘†π‘’πœ‡π›Όβˆ—π‘’πœ‡π›Όβˆ—π‘’πœ‡π›Ό=π‘†π‘’πœ‡π›Ό

For the converse, let 𝑠 =π‘’πœ‡π›Ό βˆ—π‘ž βˆ—π‘’πœˆπ›½ β‰ 0 for some π‘ž βˆˆβ„‚[𝐺]. Then

P(𝑠)Ξ›(π‘Ÿ)=Ξ›(π‘Ÿ)P(𝑠)

for all π‘Ÿ βˆˆβ„‚[𝐺] and in particular

P(𝑠)Ξ“πœ‡π›Ό(𝑔)=Ξ“πœˆπ›½(𝑔)P(𝑠)P(𝑠)P(π‘’πœ‡π›Ό)Ξ›(𝑔)=P(π‘’πœˆπ›Ό)Ξ›(𝑔)P(𝑠)P(π‘’πœ‡π›Όπ‘’πœ‡π›Όπ‘žπ‘’πœˆπ›½)Ξ›(𝑔)=Ξ›(𝑔)P(π‘’πœ‡π›Όπ‘žπ‘’πœˆπ›½π‘’πœˆπ›½)P(𝑠)Ξ›(𝑔)=Ξ›(𝑔)P(𝑠)

for all 𝑔 ∈𝐺, so by Schur's lemma the two irreps are equivalent.

Using lineΓ€rity arguments, it is sufficient to show π‘’πœ‡π›Ό βˆ—π›Ώπ‘” βˆ—π‘’πœˆπ›½ =0 for all 𝑔 ∈𝐺 to prove the idempotents generate non-equivalent irreps.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr