Five lemma
If the following diagram commutes in
and
Proof
The proof involves proving the two βfour lemmataβ, by Diagram chasing. We will use additive notation for group operations, but the groups in question need not be abelian.
First we use the fact that
- Let
π 3 β π΅ 3 - By epi
for someπΎ 4 ( π 4 ) = π½ 3 ( π 3 ) π 4 β π΄ 4 - By commutativity
π½ 4 πΎ 4 ( π 4 ) = πΎ 5 πΌ 4 ( π 4 ) - By exactness
0 = π½ 4 π½ 3 ( π 3 ) = π½ 4 πΎ 4 ( π 4 ) = πΎ 5 πΌ 4 ( π 4 ) - By mono
πΌ 4 ( π 4 ) = 0 - By exactness
π 4 β k e r β‘ πΌ 4 = i m β‘ πΌ 3 - Thus
for someπ 4 = πΌ 3 ( π 3 ) π 3 β π΄ 3 - Thus
π½ 3 πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = πΎ 4 πΌ 3 ( π 3 ) = πΎ 4 ( π 4 ) = π½ 3 ( π 3 ) - Thus
π½ 3 ( π 3 ) β π½ 3 πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By homo
π½ 3 ( π 3 β πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) ) = 0 - By exactness
π 3 β πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) β k e r β‘ π½ 3 = i m β‘ π½ 2 - Thus
for someπ 3 β πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = π½ 2 ( π 2 ) π 2 β π½ 2 - By epi
for someπ 2 = πΎ 2 ( π 2 ) π 2 β π΄ 2 - By commutativity
π½ 2 πΎ 2 ( π 2 ) = πΎ 3 πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) = π 3 β πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) - By homo
πΎ 3 ( πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) + π 3 ) = πΎ 3 πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) + πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = π 3 β πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) + πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = π 3
Therefore
- Let
, soπ 3 β k e r β‘ πΎ 3 πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By homo
π½ 3 πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By commutativity
πΎ 4 πΌ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By mono
πΌ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By exactness
π 3 β k e r β‘ πΌ 3 = i m β‘ πΌ 2 - Thus
for someπ 3 = πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) π 2 β π΄ 2 - By commutativity
π½ 2 πΎ 2 ( π 2 ) = πΎ 3 πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) = πΎ 3 ( π 3 ) = 0 - By exactness
πΎ 2 ( π 2 ) β k e r β‘ π½ 2 = i m β‘ π½ 1 - Thus
for someπΎ 2 ( π 2 ) = π½ 1 ( π 1 ) π 1 β π΅ 1 - By epi
for someπ 1 = πΎ 1 ( π 1 ) π 1 β π΄ 1 - By commutativity
πΎ 2 πΌ 1 ( π 1 ) = π½ 1 πΎ 1 ( π 1 ) = πΎ 2 ( π 2 ) - By mono
πΌ 1 ( π 1 ) = π 2 - By exactness
πΌ 2 πΌ 1 ( π 1 ) = πΌ 2 ( π 2 ) = π 3 = 0
Therefore
Every Module is a group, and every abelian category has a representation as a module category (Freyd-Mitchell theorem), so the lemma holds for module and abelian categories,
#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr
Footnotes
-
2010, Algebraische Topologie, ΒΆ3.1.10, p.130ff β©