Affine connexion

Levi-Civita connexion

Let (𝑀,π‘”π‘Žπ‘) be a semi-Riemannian manifold. The Levi-Civita connexion βˆ‡ is the unique affine connexion on 𝑀 which is torsion-free and compatible with the metric tensor in the sense that

βˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘=0,

i.e. π‘”π‘Žπ‘ is covariantly constant.

Proof of existence and uniqueness

Let Λœβˆ‡ be any torsion-free affine connexion, which must exist at least locally since we may consider partial derivative as a local affine connexion. We solve for the connexion disagreement tensor πΆπ‘π‘Žπ‘ of βˆ‡ with Λœβˆ‡ so that the former is Levi-Civita. By Covariant derivative disagreement on tensor fields we have

0=βˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘=Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘βˆ’πΆπ‘‘π‘π‘Žπ‘”π‘‘π‘βˆ’πΆπ‘‘π‘π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘‘

or after lowering indices

πΆπ‘π‘π‘Ž+πΆπ‘Žπ‘π‘=Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘.

By ^P1 we have

2πΆπ‘π‘Žπ‘=Λœβˆ‡π‘Žπ‘”π‘π‘+Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘βˆ’Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘.

which fully determines βˆ‡.1

From the above proof we see that βˆ‡ is related to any other affine connexion Λœβˆ‡ by the connexion disagreement tensor

πΆπ‘π‘Žπ‘=12(Λœβˆ‡π‘Žπ‘”π‘π‘+Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘βˆ’Λœβˆ‡π‘π‘”π‘Žπ‘)

so that

βˆ‡π‘Žπ‘‹π‘=Λœβˆ‡π‘Žπ‘‹π‘+πΆπ‘π‘Žπ‘π‘‹π‘.

In particular this gives the Christoffel symbols as the connexion coΓ«fficients.

Properties

Fundamental

Let 𝑔 =det(𝐠). We take local coΓΆrdinates π‘₯ :π‘ˆ β†’β„π‘š.

  1. √|𝑔|βˆ‡πœ‡π‘£πœ‡ =πœ•πœ‡βˆš|𝑔|π‘£πœ‡ for any vector field π‘£π‘Ž βˆˆπ”›(𝑀).
Proof

Expressing in terms of Christoffel symbols,

√|𝑔|βˆ‡πœ‡π‘£πœ‡=√|𝑔|πœ•πœ‡π‘£πœ‡+√|𝑔|Ξ“πœ‡πœ‡π›Ώπ‘£π›Ώ!=√|𝑔|πœ•πœ‡π‘£πœ‡+π‘£π›Ώπœ•π›Ώβˆš|𝑔|=πœ•πœ‡βˆš|𝑔|π‘£πœ‡

where ( !=) is by ^P1. This proves √|𝑔|βˆ‡πœ‡π‘£πœ‡ =πœ•πœ‡βˆš|𝑔|π‘£πœ‡.

Curvature

Consider the Riemannian curvature π‘…π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘ associated to βˆ‡, along with the Ricci curvature π‘…π‘Žπ‘ and scalar curvature 𝑅.

  1. π‘…π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘‘ =𝑅[π‘Žπ‘]𝑐𝑑, i.e. π‘…π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘‘ = βˆ’π‘…π‘π‘Žπ‘π‘‘.
  2. π‘…π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘‘ =π‘…π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘.
  3. π‘…π‘Žπ‘ =𝑅(π‘Žπ‘), i.e. π‘…π‘Žπ‘ =π‘…π‘π‘Ž.
  4. Bianchi identity II. βˆ‡π‘Žπ‘…π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘ +βˆ‡π‘π‘…π‘‘π‘’π‘π‘Ž +βˆ‡π‘π‘…π‘‘π‘’π‘Žπ‘ =0.
  5. The number of independent components in π‘…π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘ is 112π‘š2(π‘š2 βˆ’1) for a manifold of dimension π‘š. In particular we have 0,1,6,20 for π‘š =1,2,3,4 respectively.
  6. If π‘…π‘π‘‘π‘Žπ‘ vanishes, then there exist local coΓΆrdinate systems with the metric π‘”πœ‡πœˆ =πœ‚πœ‡πœˆ.

We take local coΓΆrdinates π‘₯ :π‘ˆ β†’β„π‘š.

  1. π‘…πœŒπœŽπœ‡πœˆ =πœ•πœ‡Ξ“πœŒπœˆπœŽ βˆ’πœ•πœˆΞ“πœŒπœ‡πœŽ +Ξ“πœŒπœ‡πœ†Ξ“πœ†πœˆπœŽ βˆ’Ξ“πœŒπœ‡πœ†Ξ“πœ†πœ‡πœŽ.
  2. 𝑅𝛼𝛽 =πœ•πœ‡Ξ“πœ‡π›Όπ›½ βˆ’Ξ“πœ‡πœŽπ›½Ξ“πœŽπ›Όπœ‡ βˆ’πœ•π›Όπœ•π›½ln⁑√|𝑔| +Ξ“πœ‡π›Όπ›½πœ•πœ‡ln⁑√|𝑔|.
Proof

#missing/proof


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2009. General relativity, theorem 3.1.1, pp. 35–36. ↩