Covering
Lift of a map to a covering space
Let 𝑋 and 𝑌 be a topological spaces,
𝑝 :˜𝑋 ↠𝑋 be a covering of 𝑋 with ˜𝑋,
and 𝑓 :𝑌 →𝑋 be a continuous map.
A lift ˜𝑓 of 𝑓 is any function so that 𝑝˜𝑓 =𝑓, #m/def/topology
i.e. the following diagram commutes in 𝖳𝗈𝗉:
%0A%20%20%20%20..%20controls%20(%24(%5Ctikztostart)!%5Cpv%7Bpos%7D!(%5Ctikztotarget)!%5Cpv%7Bheight%7D!270%3A(%5Ctikztotarget)%24)%0A%20%20%20%20and%20(%24(%5Ctikztostart)!1-%5Cpv%7Bpos%7D!(%5Ctikztotarget)!%5Cpv%7Bheight%7D!270%3A(%5Ctikztotarget)%24)%0A%20%20%20%20..%20(%5Ctikztotarget)%5Ctikztonodes%7D%7D%2C%0A%20%20%20%20settings%2F.code%3D%7B%5Ctikzset%7Bquiver%2F.cd%2C%231%7D%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%5Cdef%5Cpv%23%231%7B%5Cpgfkeysvalueof%7B%2Ftikz%2Fquiver%2F%23%231%7D%7D%7D%2C%0A%20%20%20%20quiver%2F.cd%2Cpos%2F.initial%3D0.35%2Cheight%2F.initial%3D0%7D%0A%5Ctikzset%7Btail%20reversed%2F.code%3D%7B%5Cpgfsetarrowsstart%7Btikzcd%20to%7D%7D%7D%0A%5Ctikzset%7B2tail%2F.code%3D%7B%5Cpgfsetarrowsstart%7BImplies%5Breversed%5D%7D%7D%7D%0A%5Ctikzset%7B2tail%20reversed%2F.code%3D%7B%5Cpgfsetarrowsstart%7BImplies%7D%7D%7D%0A%5Ctikzset%7Bno%20body%2F.style%3D%7B%2Ftikz%2Fdash%20pattern%3Don%200%20off%201mm%7D%7D%0A%25%20https%3A%2F%2Fq.uiver.app%2F%23q%3DWzAsMyxbMiwyLCJYIl0sWzIsMCwiXFx0aWxkZSBYIl0sWzAsMiwiWSJdLFsyLDAsImYiXSxbMSwwLCJwIiwwLHsic3R5bGUiOnsiaGVhZCI6eyJuYW1lIjoiZXBpIn19fV0sWzIsMSwiXFx0aWxkZSBmIl1d%0A%5Cbegin%7Btikzcd%7D%5Bampersand%20replacement%3D%5C%26%5D%0A%09%5C%26%5C%26%20%7B%5Ctilde%20X%7D%20%5C%5C%0A%09%5C%5C%0A%09Y%20%5C%26%5C%26%20X%0A%09%5Carrow%5B%22f%22%2C%20from%3D3-1%2C%20to%3D3-3%5D%0A%09%5Carrow%5B%22p%22%2C%20two%20heads%2C%20from%3D1-3%2C%20to%3D3-3%5D%0A%09%5Carrow%5B%22%7B%5Ctilde%20f%7D%22%2C%20from%3D3-1%2C%20to%3D1-3%5D%0A%5Cend%7Btikzcd%7D%0A#invert)
Lifts fill a fundamental role in Homotopy theory MOC,
in particular they allow for the computation of the Fundamental group.
Their usefulness follows from the main theorem below.
Main theorem
Let 𝑝 :(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0) ↠(𝑋,𝑥0) be a connected covering,
(𝑌,𝑦0) be a connected and locally path-connected1 space,
and 𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦0) →(𝑋,𝑥0) be a morphism in 𝖳𝗈𝗉•.
Then there exists a lift ˜𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦0) →(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0) of 𝑓 iff #m/thm/topology
𝜋1𝑓(𝜋1(𝑌,𝑦0))⊆𝜋1𝑝(𝜋1(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0))
i.e. the image of 𝜋1𝑓 is a subset of the image2 of 𝜋1𝑝, where 𝜋1 is the Fundamental group functor.
Furthermore if ˜𝑓 exists it is unique.
Construction of lift
A lift ˜𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦) →(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0) of 𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦) →(𝑋,𝑥0) is constructed as follows:
For each 𝑦 ∈𝑌, by path-connectedness there exists a path 𝜔 :𝕀 →𝑌 from 𝑦0 to 𝑦.
Then define a path 𝛼 =𝑓𝜔 in 𝑋, which by Second lemma Lifts of paths has a unique lift ˜𝛼 with ˜𝛼(0) =˜𝑥0.
Then let ˜𝑓(𝑦) =˜𝛼(1).
The proof involves four lemmas, each relying on the previous:
Uniqueness may be proven immediately,
then we prove the special cases of lifts of paths and lifts of homotopies of paths,
and then the requirement given for the fundamental group.
First lemma: Uniqueness
Let 𝑝 :˜𝑋 ↠𝑋 be a connected covering,
𝑌 be a connected space,
𝑓 :𝑌 →𝑋 be a continuous function,
and ˜𝑓1,˜𝑓2 :𝑌 →˜𝑋 be lifts of 𝑥.
Then ˜𝑓1 =˜𝑓2 iff ˜𝑓1(𝑦0) =˜𝑓2(𝑦0) for some 𝑦0 ∈𝑌. #m/thm/topology
Proof
The reverse direction is obvious.
For the forward direction, consider the set
𝑀={𝑦∈𝑌:˜𝑓1(𝑦)=˜𝑓2(𝑦)}Let 𝑦 ∈𝑌, 𝑥 =𝑓(𝑦) ∈𝑋, and 𝑈 ⊆𝑋 be an evenly covered open neighbourhood of 𝑥.
Let ˜𝑈1,˜𝑈2 ⊆˜𝑋 be the sheets over 𝑈 containing ˜𝑓1(𝑦) and ˜𝑓2(𝑦) respectively.
Then 𝑉 =˜𝑓−11(˜𝑈1) ∩˜𝑓−12(˜𝑈2) is an open neighbourhood of 𝑦, and
˜𝑓1↾𝑉=(𝑝↾˜𝑈1)−1∘(𝑓↾𝑉)˜𝑓2↾𝑉=(𝑝↾˜𝑈2)−1∘(𝑓↾𝑉)Now if ˜𝑓1(𝑦) =˜𝑓2(𝑦), then ˜𝑈1 =˜𝑈2 and consequently
˜𝑓1↾𝑉=(𝑝↾˜𝑈1)−1∘(𝑓↾𝑉)=(𝑝↾˜𝑈2)−1∘(𝑓↾𝑉)=˜𝑓2↾𝑉Thus 𝑀 is the union of all 𝑉 obtained from 𝑦 with ˜𝑓1(𝑦) =˜𝑓2(𝑦) and is thus open.
Now if ˜𝑓1(𝑦) ≠˜𝑓2(𝑦), then ˜𝑈1 ≠˜𝑈2 and consequently ˜𝑓1(𝑧) ≠˜𝑓2(𝑧) for all 𝑧 ∈𝑉.
Thus 𝑌 ∖𝑀 is the union of all 𝑉 obtained from 𝑦 with ˜𝑓1(𝑦) ≠˜𝑓2(𝑦) and is thus open.
Therefore 𝑀 is clopen and inhabited (𝑦0 ∈𝑀),
so since 𝑌 is connected, 𝑀 =𝑌.
Hence ˜𝑓1 =˜𝑓2.
Second lemma: Lifts of paths
Let 𝑝 :˜𝑋 ↠𝑋 be a connected covering and 𝛼 :𝕀 →𝑋 be a continuous path from 𝑥0 =𝛼(0).
For each ˜𝑥0 ∈𝑝−1{𝑥0} there exists exactly one lifted path ˜𝛼 :𝕀 →˜𝑋 from ˜𝛼(0) =˜𝑥0. #m/thm/topology
Proof
Uniqueness follows from First lemma Uniqueness, but is also self-evident in the following argument.
For each 𝑥 ∈𝑋, let 𝑈𝑥 be an evenly covered open neighbourhood of 𝑥.
Then {𝑈𝑥}𝑥∈𝑋 is an open cover of 𝑋,
and {𝛼−1(𝑈𝑥)}𝑥∈𝑋 is an open cover of 𝕀.
Using a Lebesgue number 𝕀 may be evenly subdivided with
0=𝑡0<⋯<𝑡𝑘=1so that 𝛼[𝑡𝑖−1,𝑡𝑖] ⊆𝑈𝑥𝑖 where 𝑥𝑖 ∈𝑋 for all 1 ≤𝑖 ≤𝑘.
Now consider a lift ˜𝛼 :𝕀 →˜𝑋.
Clearly ˜𝛼 ↾[𝑡𝑖−1,𝑡𝑖] =(𝑝 ↾˜𝑈𝑖)−1 ∘(𝛼 ↾[𝑡𝑖−1,𝑡𝑖]),
where ˜𝑈𝑖 is the sheet over 𝑈𝑥𝑖 containing 𝛼(𝑡𝑖−1).
Thus if ˜𝛼(0) =˜𝑥0 is set, ˜𝛼 is unique and well-defined.
Third lemma: Lifts of homotopies of paths
Let 𝑝 :˜𝑋 ↠𝑋 be a connected covering and 𝛼0,𝛼1 :𝕀 →𝑋 be continuous paths with the same endpoints 𝑥0,𝑥1 homotopic to one another via 𝐴 :𝕀2 →𝑋 :(𝑡,𝑠) ↦𝛼𝑠(𝑡).
Let ˜𝑥0 ∈𝑝−1{𝑥0} and ˜𝛼0,˜𝛼1 :𝕀 →˜𝑋 be the unique lifts of 𝛼0,𝛼1 respectively with ˜𝛼0(0) =˜𝛼1(0) =˜𝑥0.
Then there exists a unique lift ˜𝐴 :˜𝛼0 ≃˜𝛼1 of the homotopy 𝐴,
and in particular ˜𝛼0(1) =˜𝛼1(1). #m/thm/homotopy
Proof
First, notice that if a lift ˜𝐴 :𝕀2 →˜𝑋 of 𝐴 :𝕀2 →𝑋 with 𝐴(0,0) =˜𝑥0 exists,
it is necessarily unique (by First lemma Uniqueness)
and a homotopy from ˜𝛼0 to ˜𝛼1:
Clearly 𝑝˜𝐴(0,𝑠) =𝑥0 and 𝑝˜𝐴(1,𝑠) =𝑥1 for all 𝑠 ∈𝕀,
and since 𝑝−1{𝑥0} and 𝑝−1{𝑥1} are discrete,
both ˜𝐴(0,𝑠) and ˜𝐴(1,𝑠) must be constant for all 𝑠 ∈𝕀,
so ˜𝐴(0,𝑠) =˜𝑥0 and we let ˜𝐴(1,𝑠) =˜𝑥1.
By construction ˜𝐴 is a homotopy from ˜𝐴( −,0) to ˜𝐴( −,1),
but ˜𝐴( −,𝑠) is a lift of 𝛼𝑠 with ˜𝐴(0,𝑠) =0 for each 𝑠 ∈𝕀,
thus by uniqueness ˜𝐴( −,𝑠) =˜𝛼𝑠 in particular for 𝑠 =0,1,
and hence ˜𝐴 is the desired homotopy.
For existence we use a similar construction to above:
Using a Lebesgue number argument 𝕀2 may be subdivided into a grid with
0=𝑡0<⋯<𝑡𝑘=10=𝑠0<⋯<𝑠𝑘=1so that for each square 𝑄𝑖𝑗 =[𝑡𝑖,𝑡𝑖+1] ×[𝑠𝑗,𝑠𝑗+1] with 0 ≤𝑖 ≤𝑘 −1,
its image 𝐴(𝑄𝑖𝑗) is contained entirely within an evenly covered open set 𝑈𝑖𝑗 in 𝑋,
i.e. 𝐴(𝑄𝑖𝑗) ⊆𝑈𝑖𝑗.
Now consider a lift ˜𝐴 :𝕀2 →˜𝑋.
If the bottom left corner ˜𝐴(𝑡𝑖,𝑠𝑗) is set,
then clearly ˜𝐴 ↾𝑄𝑖𝑗 =(𝑝 ↾˜𝑈𝑖𝑗)−1 ∘(𝐴 ↾𝑄𝑖𝑗), where ˜𝑈𝑖𝑗 is the sheet over 𝑈𝑖𝑗 containing ˜𝐴(𝑡𝑖,𝑠𝑗).
Then by Second lemma Lifts of paths the edges automatically agree,
thus by starting with ˜𝐴(0,0) =˜𝑥0 we obtain a well-defined, unique lift ˜𝐴 of 𝐴.
Fourth lemma: Condition for the existence of a lift
Let 𝑝 :(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0) ↠(𝑋,𝑥0) be a connected covering,
(𝑌,𝑦0) be a path-connected space,
and 𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦0) →(𝑋,𝑥0) be a morphism in 𝖳𝗈𝗉•.
If a lift ˜𝑓 :(𝑌,𝑦0) →(˜𝑋,𝑥0) exists, then
𝜋1𝑓(𝜋1(𝑌,𝑦0)) ⊆𝜋1𝑝(𝜋1(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0)). #m/thm/homotopy
Proof
Since 𝑝˜𝑓 =𝑓, it follows from functor properties of the Fundamental group that (𝜋1𝑝)(𝜋1˜𝑓) =𝜋1𝑓,
and thus the image of 𝜋1𝑓 must be contained within the image of 𝜋1𝑝.
Proof of main theorem
The forward direction follows from Fourth lemma Condition for the existence of a lift.
Proof the construction is well-definined
It remains to show that ˜𝛼(1) is independent from the choice of path 𝜔.
To this end let 𝜈 :𝕀 →𝑌 be a path from 𝑦0 to 𝑦.
Then ――𝜔 ⊙𝜈 is a continuous loop with basepoint 𝑦0.
Since 𝑓 ∘(――𝜔 ⊙𝜈) is guaranteed a lift by Second lemma Lifts of paths,
it follows 𝜋1𝑓[――𝜔 ⊙𝜈] ∈𝜋1𝑝(𝜋1(˜𝑋,˜𝑥0)),
and thus there exists a continuous loop ˜𝜇 :𝕀 →˜𝑋 with basepoint ˜𝑥0 such that 𝜋1𝑓[――𝜔 ⊙𝜈] =𝜋1𝑝[˜𝜇].
Let 𝛼 =𝑓 ∘𝜔, 𝛽 =𝑓 ∘𝜈, and 𝜇 =𝑝 ∘˜𝜇,
so [𝛼]−1 ⊙[𝛽] =[𝜇] and thus 𝛽 ≃𝛼 ⊙𝜇.
Then if ˜𝛼 and ˜𝛽 are the lifts of 𝛼 and 𝛽 respectively with ˜𝛼(0) =˜𝛽(0) =˜𝑦0,
then ˜𝛼 ⊙˜𝜇 is the lift of 𝛼 ⊙𝜇.
Hence by Third lemma Lifts of homotopies of paths, ˜𝛽 ≃˜𝑎 ⊙˜𝜇,
and in particular ˜𝛽(1) =˜𝛼 ⊙˜𝜇(1) =˜𝛼(1).
Hence ˜𝛼(1) is the same regardless of the selected path 𝜔.
#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr