Commutative algebra MOC

Localization of a commutative ring

Let 𝑅 be a commutative ring and 𝑆 be a multiplicative submonoid. The localization of 𝑅 at 𝑆 is a certain universal solution to the problem of adding inverses for each element in 𝑆. Specifically, it consists of a ring 𝑆1𝑅 equipped with a ring homomorphism 𝑗𝑅,𝑆 :𝑅 𝑆1𝑅 such that

  1. we have 𝑗(𝑆) (𝑆1𝑅)×, the group of units of 𝑆1𝑅;
  2. if 𝜑 :𝑅 𝑇 is a ring homomorphism with 𝜑(𝑅) 𝑇×, then there exists a unique factorization ¯𝜑 :𝑆1𝑅 𝑇 so that 𝜑 =¯𝜑𝑗.

If we instead have set of elements 𝑆, we denote the localization at the submonoid generated by 𝑆 by 𝑅[𝑆1].

Caveat emptor

If the set 𝑆 is not regular, then 𝑗 :𝑅 𝑅[𝑆1] may not be injective, in which case 𝑅[𝑆1] is not a true adjunction of a ring. See Regulars and zero-divisors.

Construction

The localization is typically constructed as follows. Elements of 𝑆1𝑅 are formal quotients 𝑥/𝑠 for some 𝑥 𝑅 and 𝑠 𝑆. Addition and multiplication are defined in the usual manner, i.e.

𝑥𝑠1+𝑦𝑠2=𝑠2𝑥+𝑠1𝑦𝑠1𝑠2,𝑥𝑠1𝑦𝑠2=𝑥𝑦𝑠1𝑠2,

and equality is defined by

𝑥1𝑠1=𝑥2𝑠2𝑠𝑆𝑠𝑠2𝑥1=𝑠𝑠1𝑥2.

The morphism 𝑗 is defined by 𝑥 𝑥/1.

Proof of universal property

To see ^L1, note that the inverse of 𝑗(𝑠) =𝑠/1 is just 1/𝑠. For ^L2, suppose 𝜑 is such a homomorphism. It is clear that any putative factorization must satisfy ¯𝜑 :𝑥/𝑠 𝜑(𝑥)𝜑(𝑠)1, so it suffices to show this map is well-defined in general. Suppose 𝑥1,𝑥2 𝑅 and 𝑠,𝑠1,𝑠2 𝑆 so that 𝑠𝑠2𝑥1 =𝑠𝑠1𝑥2. Then

𝜑(𝑠)𝜑(𝑠2)𝜑(𝑥1)=𝜑(𝑠)𝜑(𝑠1)𝜑(𝑥2).

Multiplying both sides by 𝜑(𝑠𝑠1𝑠2)1 gives

𝜑(𝑥1)𝜑(𝑠1)1=𝜑(𝑥2)𝜑(𝑠2)1,

so indeed ¯𝜑 :𝑆1𝑅 𝑇 is well defined.

Explanation of terminology

Suppose our ring is that of smooth scalar fields on a 𝐶-manifold 𝑀, 𝑓 𝐶(𝑀) and 𝑈 =supp𝑓 is its support. Then the localization 𝐶(𝑀)[1/𝑓] corresponds to the subalgebra of 𝐶(supp𝑓) consisting of scalar fields of the form (𝑔 𝑈)/(𝑓 𝑈)𝑚 for some 𝑔 𝐶(𝑀) and 𝑚 .

Regulars and zero-divisors

Let 𝑅 be a ring, 𝑎 𝑅 be an element, 𝑆 =𝑎 be the multiplicative monoid generated thereby. Then

  1. If 𝑎 is regular, then 𝑗 :𝑅 𝑆1𝑅 is injective.

We can consider two special cases where 𝑎 is a zero-divisor:

  1. If 𝑎 is nilpotent, then 𝑆1𝑅 0.
  2. If 𝑎 is an idempotent then 𝑗 :𝑅 𝑆1𝑅 is surjective and 𝑆1𝑅 =𝑅/1 𝑎.
Proof

For ^j1, suppose we have 𝑥,𝑦 𝑅 such that 𝑗(𝑥) =𝑗(𝑦), i.e. 𝑥/1 =𝑦/1. By the definition of equality in 𝑆1𝑅, this means there exists some such that 𝑎𝑥 =𝑎𝑦, which by regularity of 𝑎 can only occur if 𝑥 =𝑦. Therefore 𝑗 is injective.

For ^j2, note that 𝑎 being nilpotent implies 0 𝑆. Given any 𝑥/𝑎,𝑦/𝑎𝑘 𝑅1𝑆, we then have 0𝑎𝑘𝑥 =0 =0𝑎𝑦 so 𝑥/𝑎 =𝑦/𝑎𝑘. Therefore 𝑆1𝑅 is trivial.

For ^j3, first note that 𝑗(𝑎) =𝑗(1) =1, since 𝑎 1 𝑎 =𝑎 𝑎 1. It follows that 𝑗 is surjective, since 𝑥/𝑎 =𝑥/1 =𝑗(𝑥) for . By the First isomorphism theorem, we just need to show that ker𝑗 =1 𝑎. It is clear that 1 𝑎 ker𝑗. To show that ker𝑗 1 𝑎, suppose 𝑥 ker𝑗, i.e. 𝑗(𝑥) =𝑥/1 =0/1 =0. Then either 𝑥 =0 or 𝑎𝑥 =0. In the first case we are done, and in the second case we have 𝑎𝑥 =0 whence 𝑥 =𝑥(𝑎 1) 𝑎 1. Therefore ker𝑗 =1 𝑎 as required.

See also


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr