Fundamental groupoid

Seifert-Van Kampen-Brown theorem

Let ๐‘‹ be a topological space with open cover {๐‘ˆ,๐‘‰}. Then the following is a fibre coproduct in ๐–ณ๐—ˆ๐—‰ on the left and in ๐–ฆ๐—‹๐—‰๐–ฝ on the right.12 #m/thm/homotopy

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsOCxbMCwwLCJVXFxjYXAgViJdLFswLDIsIlUiXSxbMiwwLCJWIl0sWzIsMiwiWCJdLFs0LDAsIlxccGlfMShVIFxcY2FwIFYpIl0sWzQsMiwiXFxwaV8xKFUpIl0sWzYsMiwiXFxwaV8xKFgpIl0sWzYsMCwiXFxwaV8xKFYpIl0sWzAsMiwiaV8yIl0sWzAsMSwiaV8xIiwyXSxbMSwzLCJqXzEiXSxbMiwzLCJqXzIiXSxbNCw3LCJcXHBpXzEgaV8yIl0sWzQsNSwiXFxwaV8xaV8xIiwyXSxbNSw2LCJcXHBpXzFqXzEiLDJdLFs3LDYsIlxccGlfMmpfMiJdLFs2LDQsIiIsMSx7InN0eWxlIjp7Im5hbWUiOiJjb3JuZXIifX1dLFszLDAsIiIsMCx7InN0eWxlIjp7Im5hbWUiOiJjb3JuZXIifX1dXQ==

where ๐‘–1,๐‘–2,๐‘—1,๐‘—2 denote natural inclusions; i.e. the Fundamental groupoid of ๐‘‹ is a fibre coproduct of the fundamental groupoids of the open covering spaces ๐‘ˆ and ๐‘‰.

Proof

For the left diagram see Fibre products and coproducts in Top. Now suppose (๐บ,๐‘“1,๐‘“2) fits into the following diagram.

https://q.uiver.app/#q=WzAsNSxbMCwwLCJcXHBpXzEoVSBcXGNhcCBWKSJdLFswLDIsIlxccGlfMShVKSJdLFsyLDIsIlxccGlfMShYKSJdLFsyLDAsIlxccGlfMShWKSJdLFs0LDQsIkciXSxbMCwzLCJcXHBpXzEgaV8yIl0sWzAsMSwiXFxwaV8xaV8xIiwyXSxbMSwyLCJcXHBpXzFqXzEiLDJdLFszLDIsIlxccGlfMmpfMiJdLFsyLDAsIiIsMSx7InN0eWxlIjp7Im5hbWUiOiJjb3JuZXIifX1dLFsxLDQsImZfMSIsMix7ImN1cnZlIjoxfV0sWzMsNCwiZl8yIiwwLHsiY3VydmUiOi0xfV0sWzIsNCwiZiIsMSx7InN0eWxlIjp7ImJvZHkiOnsibmFtZSI6ImRhc2hlZCJ9fX1dXQ==

We must show the existence of a unique ๐‘“ such that the diagram commutes.

Uniqueness is the easier part to prove: For objects (points), if ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ๐‘ˆ then ๐‘“๐‘ฅ =๐‘“1๐‘ฅ; if ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ๐‘‰ then ๐‘“๐‘ฅ =๐‘“2๐‘ฅ; and if ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ๐‘ˆ โˆฉ๐‘‰ the assignments agree. For a homotopy path [๐›พ] โˆˆ๐œ‹1๐‘‹(๐‘ฅ,๐‘ฆ) uniqueness follows from a representative ๐›พ :๐•€ โ†’๐‘‹. Using a Lebesgue number, ๐•€ may be evenly subdivided into sections either entirely in either ๐›พโˆ’1๐‘ˆ or ๐›พโˆ’1๐‘‰, giving paths ๐›พ1,โ€ฆ,๐›พ๐‘› where ๐›พ โ‰ƒ๐›พ1โ‹ฏ๐›พ๐‘› Thus ๐‘“[๐›พ] must agree with applying ๐‘“1 and ๐‘“2 to each component path, which is clearly invariant under refinement and therefore independent of the precise decomposition.

For existence, we need to show that ๐‘“ is independent of the representative ๐›พ. Let ๐›พ0 โ‰ƒ๐›พ1 by virtue of a homotopy of paths ๐ป :(๐‘ก,๐‘ ) โ†ฆ๐›พ๐‘ (๐‘ก). Once again a Lebesgue number may be used to divide ๐•€2 into a ๐‘˜ ร—๐‘˜ grid such that each box is entirely in either ฮ“โˆ’1๐‘ˆ or ฮ“โˆ’1๐‘‰. Assign to the box with bottom-left corner at (๐‘–๐‘˜,๐‘—๐‘˜) the paths ๐‘Ž๐‘—,๐‘–,๐‘Ž๐‘—+1,๐‘– :๐•€ โ†’๐•€2 rightwards along its top and bottom edges respectively, and ๐‘๐‘–,๐‘—,๐‘๐‘–,๐‘—+1 :๐•€ โ†’๐•€2 upwards along its left and right edges respectively. Clearly ๐‘๐‘–,๐‘— โ‹…๐‘Ž๐‘—+1,๐‘– โ‰ƒ๐‘Ž๐‘—,๐‘– โ‹…๐‘๐‘–+1,๐‘— as paths, and ๐‘Ž๐‘—,๐‘– โ‰ƒ๐‘๐‘–,๐‘— โ‹…๐‘Ž๐‘—+1,๐‘– โ‹…โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•๐‘๐‘–+1,๐‘—. Since ฮ“๐‘0,๐‘—/๐‘˜ and ฮ“๐‘1,๐‘—/๐‘˜ are constant paths in either ๐‘ˆ or ๐‘‰, applying ฮ“ to get paths in ๐‘‹ for each ๐‘— =0,โ€ฆ,๐‘˜

๐‘“๐›พ๐‘—/๐‘˜=๐‘˜โจ€๐‘–=0๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘Ž๐‘—/๐‘˜,๐‘–/๐‘˜=๐‘˜โจ€๐‘–=0๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘๐‘–/๐‘˜,๐‘—/๐‘˜โŠ™๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘Ž(๐‘—+1)/๐‘˜,๐‘–/๐‘˜โŠ™๐‘“โ—ปฮ“โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•๐‘(๐‘–+1)/๐‘˜,๐‘—/๐‘˜=๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘0,๐‘—/๐‘˜โŠ™(๐‘˜โจ€๐‘–=0๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘Ž(๐‘—+1)/๐‘˜,๐‘–/๐‘˜)โŠ™๐‘“โ—ปฮ“โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•๐‘1,๐‘—/๐‘˜=๐‘˜โจ€๐‘–=0๐‘“โ—ปฮ“๐‘Ž(๐‘—+1)/๐‘˜,๐‘–/๐‘˜=๐‘“๐›พ(๐‘—+1)/๐‘˜

where ๐‘“โ—ป denotes applying ๐‘“1 or ๐‘“2 depending on whether a path is in ๐‘ˆ or ๐‘‰. It follows from ๐‘˜ iterations that ๐‘“๐›พ0 =๐‘“๐›พ1.

The classical Seifert-Van Kampen theorem concerns the Fundamental group, which can easily be derived from the above theorem. Ronald Brown introduced the groupoid formulation.


#state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr

Footnotes

  1. 2020, Topology: A categorical approach, ยง6.7, pp. 139โ€“140 โ†ฉ

  2. 2006, Topology and groupoids, ยง6.7, pp. 240ff โ†ฉ